MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366420863 · doi:10.3390/atmos14040733

Spatiotemporal Patterns and Characteristics of PM2.5 Pollution in the Yellow River Golden Triangle Demonstration Area

2023· article· en· W4366420863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ning Jin, Liang He, Haixia Jia, Mingxing Qin, Dongyan Zhang, Cheng Wang, Xiaojian Li, Yanlin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmosphere · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePollutionSeasonalitySpatial ecologySpatial variabilityPhysical geographyStructural basinDrainage basinCommon spatial patternHydrology (agriculture)Atmospheric sciencesClimatologyGeographyEcologyGeologyBiologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improving air quality in the Yellow River Golden Triangle Demonstration Area (YRGTDA) is an important practice for ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. Preventing and controlling PM2.5 pollution in this region will require a scientific understanding of the spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of PM2.5 pollution. PM2.5 data from different sources were combined in this study (the annual average of PM2.5 concentrations were obtained from the Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group of Dalhousie University, and the daily PM2.5 concentration data were obtained from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre). Then, the temporal variation of PM2.5 concentrations at annual, seasonal, and monthly scales, the spatial variation of PM2.5 concentrations, and the variation of PM2.5 pollution classes were analyzed. Results showed that: (1) at the annual scale, the PM2.5 concentrations showed a decreasing trend from 2000 to 2021 in the study area. The variation of PM2.5 concentrations were divided into two different stages. (2) At the seasonal scale, high PM2.5 concentrations occurred mainly in winter, low PM2.5 concentrations occurred in summer. At the monthly scale, PM2.5 concentrations showed a U-shaped variation pattern from January to December each year. (3) The hotspot analysis of the PM2.5 concentrations in the study area showed a cyclical variation pattern. (4) The PM2.5 concentrations exhibited a spatial pattern of high values in the central and low values in the northern and southern parts of YRGTDA. (5) The number of days for different PM2.5 pollution classes from 2015 to 2021 followed the order of Good > Excellent > Light pollution > Moderate pollution > Heavy pollution > Severe pollution in YRGTDA. The results of this study have great theoretical and practical significance because they reveal the spatiotemporal patterns and pollution characteristics of PM2.5 and will lead to the development of scientifically based measures to reasonably prevent and control pollution in YRGTDA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmosphereSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207