Fungsi Seni Tradisional "Karungut" dalam Pendidikan Karakter Masyarakat Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Di era modern ini, banyak orang yang hanya memikirkan bagaimana meningkatkan aspek kognitif dan psikomotor sebagai hasil dari proses pendidikan anaknya. Mereka biasanya melakukan berbagaicara untuk meningkatkan aspek tersebut namun terkadang mereka melupakan (sikap) afektif anakanaknya. Aspek afektif, yang disebut juga character building, dapat diartikan sebagai rangkaiankegiatan terencana yang dilakukan oleh orang dewasa kepada peserta didik; dengan tujuan agarpeserta didik memiliki pengetahuan dan pemahaman serta mampu menerapkan nilai-nilai kehidupanseperti kebaikan, kebenaran dan keikhlasan sebagai kebiasaan sehari-hari. Sebagaimana suku lainnya,masyarakat Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah juga memiliki cara dan alat yang berfungsi dalam pembentukan karakter, salah satunya melalui kesenian tradisional bernama “Karungut”. Karungutadalah sejenis seni lisan yang dinyanyikan dengan irama tertentu dan diiringi alat musik tradisionalbernama “Kecapi”. Ini fungsi Karungut dalam pembentukan karakter masyarakat Dayak diKalimantan Tengah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".