MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366429895 · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1204119

Editorial: Recent advances in risk and community resilience analysis against windstorms

2023· editorial· en· W4366429895 on OpenAlex
Ahmed U. Abdelhady, Arthriya Subgranon, Omar M. Nofal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Built Environment · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Community resilienceEngineeringEnvironmental sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first article, "A novel framework to study community-level social and physical impacts of hurricaneinduced winds through synthetic scenario analysis" presents a new framework for studying the social and physical impacts of hurricane-induced winds at the community level. The authors developed a computational framework to simulate the scenario of a hurricane impacting a community. Hurricane wind field is simulated using a parametric wind field model that creates synthetic hurricane tracks based on historical data. This approach enables the estimate of gust wind speed at the location of each building which is used by a stochastic damage simulation algorithm to assess the buildings' physical damage. The framework, then, uses the buildings' physical damage to estimate the direct financial losses and social impacts (e.g., household dislocation, employment disruption, and education disruption). The framework is applied to the community of Onslow County, North Carolina which develops a better understanding of the interplay between social and physical impacts.The second article, "A case study and parametric analysis of predicting hurricane-induced building damage using data-driven machine learning approach" presents a data-driven machine learning framework to predict building-level damage from future hurricanes. The framework uses exposure and hazard data as input for a classification algorithm (random forest) to categorize building vulnerability into discrete damage states (i.e., No Damage, Non-Structural Damage, and Structural Damage). The exposure data includes the building's structural, geometric, and geospatial features while the hazard data includes wind speed and water inundation. The framework is trained using available reconnaissance datasets for four hurricanes: Hurricanes Harvey (2017), Irma (2017), Michael (2018), and Laura (2020). The hindcast accuracy of the random forest algorithm is 76%. Finally, this article shows that the results from the framework outperform FEMA's Hazus Multi-Hazard Hurricane Model, which yielded 47% accuracy. This comparison offers insights into alternatives for forecasting models given the variability of rapidly available data used in the ML framework as presented.The third article, "The influence of ASCE 7-16 wind load provisions on a vulnerability model of Florida residential construction" explores the influence of the changes to the wind-load provisions in ASCE 7-16, which is adopted in the Florida Building Code, on the vulnerability of residential construction in Florida. The authors, in this study, use the vulnerability model framework within the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Projection Model. The study focuses on the development and implementation of these changes within the model and provides more insights into the effectiveness of such changes to improve community resilience.The final article, "Design of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads" focuses on the design of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads. The authors present a comprehensive study of the behavior of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads and provide design guidelines for improving the resilience of these structures. The study is conducted using a non-linear finite element model of a stick-framed roof that is designed following the guidelines in the National Building Code of Canada. The most notable findings, regarding design requirements to withstand EF-2 tornadoes, are an improved gable end frame, adding hurricane ties at all roof-to-wall connections, and increasing the number of nails at various connections.In conclusion, this research topic provides valuable insights into the risk and resilience against windstorms and highlights the importance of continued research in this area. The articles presented in this research topic demonstrate the use of innovative approaches to understanding windstorm risk and improving resilience, and provide important contributions to the field of windstorm risk and resilience analysis. We hope that this research topic will serve as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it