Editorial: Recent advances in risk and community resilience analysis against windstorms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The first article, "A novel framework to study community-level social and physical impacts of hurricaneinduced winds through synthetic scenario analysis" presents a new framework for studying the social and physical impacts of hurricane-induced winds at the community level. The authors developed a computational framework to simulate the scenario of a hurricane impacting a community. Hurricane wind field is simulated using a parametric wind field model that creates synthetic hurricane tracks based on historical data. This approach enables the estimate of gust wind speed at the location of each building which is used by a stochastic damage simulation algorithm to assess the buildings' physical damage. The framework, then, uses the buildings' physical damage to estimate the direct financial losses and social impacts (e.g., household dislocation, employment disruption, and education disruption). The framework is applied to the community of Onslow County, North Carolina which develops a better understanding of the interplay between social and physical impacts.The second article, "A case study and parametric analysis of predicting hurricane-induced building damage using data-driven machine learning approach" presents a data-driven machine learning framework to predict building-level damage from future hurricanes. The framework uses exposure and hazard data as input for a classification algorithm (random forest) to categorize building vulnerability into discrete damage states (i.e., No Damage, Non-Structural Damage, and Structural Damage). The exposure data includes the building's structural, geometric, and geospatial features while the hazard data includes wind speed and water inundation. The framework is trained using available reconnaissance datasets for four hurricanes: Hurricanes Harvey (2017), Irma (2017), Michael (2018), and Laura (2020). The hindcast accuracy of the random forest algorithm is 76%. Finally, this article shows that the results from the framework outperform FEMA's Hazus Multi-Hazard Hurricane Model, which yielded 47% accuracy. This comparison offers insights into alternatives for forecasting models given the variability of rapidly available data used in the ML framework as presented.The third article, "The influence of ASCE 7-16 wind load provisions on a vulnerability model of Florida residential construction" explores the influence of the changes to the wind-load provisions in ASCE 7-16, which is adopted in the Florida Building Code, on the vulnerability of residential construction in Florida. The authors, in this study, use the vulnerability model framework within the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Projection Model. The study focuses on the development and implementation of these changes within the model and provides more insights into the effectiveness of such changes to improve community resilience.The final article, "Design of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads" focuses on the design of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads. The authors present a comprehensive study of the behavior of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads and provide design guidelines for improving the resilience of these structures. The study is conducted using a non-linear finite element model of a stick-framed roof that is designed following the guidelines in the National Building Code of Canada. The most notable findings, regarding design requirements to withstand EF-2 tornadoes, are an improved gable end frame, adding hurricane ties at all roof-to-wall connections, and increasing the number of nails at various connections.In conclusion, this research topic provides valuable insights into the risk and resilience against windstorms and highlights the importance of continued research in this area. The articles presented in this research topic demonstrate the use of innovative approaches to understanding windstorm risk and improving resilience, and provide important contributions to the field of windstorm risk and resilience analysis. We hope that this research topic will serve as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working in this area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».