MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366429895 · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1204119

Editorial: Recent advances in risk and community resilience analysis against windstorms

2023· editorial· en· W4366429895 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed U. Abdelhady, Arthriya Subgranon, Omar M. Nofal

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Built Environment · 2023
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueWind and Air Flow Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésResilience (materials science)Community resilienceEngineeringEnvironmental sciencePhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The first article, "A novel framework to study community-level social and physical impacts of hurricaneinduced winds through synthetic scenario analysis" presents a new framework for studying the social and physical impacts of hurricane-induced winds at the community level. The authors developed a computational framework to simulate the scenario of a hurricane impacting a community. Hurricane wind field is simulated using a parametric wind field model that creates synthetic hurricane tracks based on historical data. This approach enables the estimate of gust wind speed at the location of each building which is used by a stochastic damage simulation algorithm to assess the buildings' physical damage. The framework, then, uses the buildings' physical damage to estimate the direct financial losses and social impacts (e.g., household dislocation, employment disruption, and education disruption). The framework is applied to the community of Onslow County, North Carolina which develops a better understanding of the interplay between social and physical impacts.The second article, "A case study and parametric analysis of predicting hurricane-induced building damage using data-driven machine learning approach" presents a data-driven machine learning framework to predict building-level damage from future hurricanes. The framework uses exposure and hazard data as input for a classification algorithm (random forest) to categorize building vulnerability into discrete damage states (i.e., No Damage, Non-Structural Damage, and Structural Damage). The exposure data includes the building's structural, geometric, and geospatial features while the hazard data includes wind speed and water inundation. The framework is trained using available reconnaissance datasets for four hurricanes: Hurricanes Harvey (2017), Irma (2017), Michael (2018), and Laura (2020). The hindcast accuracy of the random forest algorithm is 76%. Finally, this article shows that the results from the framework outperform FEMA's Hazus Multi-Hazard Hurricane Model, which yielded 47% accuracy. This comparison offers insights into alternatives for forecasting models given the variability of rapidly available data used in the ML framework as presented.The third article, "The influence of ASCE 7-16 wind load provisions on a vulnerability model of Florida residential construction" explores the influence of the changes to the wind-load provisions in ASCE 7-16, which is adopted in the Florida Building Code, on the vulnerability of residential construction in Florida. The authors, in this study, use the vulnerability model framework within the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Projection Model. The study focuses on the development and implementation of these changes within the model and provides more insights into the effectiveness of such changes to improve community resilience.The final article, "Design of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads" focuses on the design of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads. The authors present a comprehensive study of the behavior of stick-framed wood roofs under tornado wind loads and provide design guidelines for improving the resilience of these structures. The study is conducted using a non-linear finite element model of a stick-framed roof that is designed following the guidelines in the National Building Code of Canada. The most notable findings, regarding design requirements to withstand EF-2 tornadoes, are an improved gable end frame, adding hurricane ties at all roof-to-wall connections, and increasing the number of nails at various connections.In conclusion, this research topic provides valuable insights into the risk and resilience against windstorms and highlights the importance of continued research in this area. The articles presented in this research topic demonstrate the use of innovative approaches to understanding windstorm risk and improving resilience, and provide important contributions to the field of windstorm risk and resilience analysis. We hope that this research topic will serve as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working in this area.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,362
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Built EnvironmentMême sujetWind and Air Flow StudiesTravaux en français237 207