MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366464227 · doi:10.1128/jcm.00620-22

The Brief Case: an Infectious Hazard of Hunting

2023· review· en· W4366464227 on OpenAlexafffund
Martin Cheung, Daisy Yu, Tracy Chan, Navdeep Chahil, Christine Tchao, Michael Slatnik, Shobhit Maruti, Nina Sidhu, Brad Scandrett, Natalie Prystajecky, Muhammad Morshed, Catherine A. Hogan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Food Inspection AgencyInterior HealthBC Centre for Disease Control
FundersBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlCanadian Food Inspection Agency
KeywordsHazardVirologyMedicineBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 38-year-old previously healthy man residing in British Columbia (BC), Canada, presented to medical attention with a 5-day history of fever, chills, night sweats, diffuse myalgias, and arthralgias.He presented no recent travel history.Several months earlier, he had successfully harvested a black bear (Ursus americanus) in BC, and the gathered meat was divided into several pieces and conserved frozen for later consumption.Two days prior to symptom onset, he and four household members ingested meat from the bear which had been thawed and cooked as meatballs.Three other household members also fell ill in the same time frame, but with milder symptoms that did not prompt medical assessment.Several meatballs were subsequently found to have not been thoroughly cooked.Two days after ingestion, the patient noted vague abdominal discomfort and nausea.Eight days after ingestion, he reported intense fever and chills.He also developed mild headache, severe prostration, myalgia in proximal limb muscles, transient abdominal pain, and pink-tinged urine that had resolved at the time of presentation.He denied any vomiting, diarrhea, chest pain, shortness of breath, adenopathy, or rash.The fever lasted for 9 days total, manifesting primarily at night.On examination, his vital signs and physical exam findings were within normal limits.Complete blood cell count was notable for a mildly increased white blood cell count (10.4*10 9 /L; normal range 4.0 to 10.0), and hypereosinophilia (3.3*10 9 /L; normal range 0 to 0.50).Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (61U/L; normal range 15 to 45), creatine kinase (762U/L; normal range 55 to 170), and C-reactive protein (64.6 mg/L; normal ,10) were all elevated.Bilirubin, creatinine, and international normalized ratio (INR) were within normal range.SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR respiratory testing was negative, as was HIV screening, and blood cultures at 5 days of incubation.Trichinella serology by commercial indirect enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) targeting the excretory-secretory (ES) antigen performed at the National Reference Center for Parasitology (Montreal, Canada) on a sample drawn 1 week after ingestion of the bear meat was negative.Given the clinical suspicion for Trichinella infection, empirical treatment with mebendazole (400 mg po TID) was initiated on day 12 of illness, for a total of 13 days.The diagnosis of acute trichinellosis was subsequently confirmed based on repeat serological testing performed at the same reference laboratory with the same methodology as initially performed 6 weeks after having consumed the harvested meat which demonstrated a high positive response (optical density [OD] of 3.57; reference high positive cut-off OD $ 1.20).Further microbiological investigations were performed to confirm the source and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.211
GPT teacher head0.558
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207