Kinetochore deterioration concommitant with centromere weakening during aging in mouse oocyte meiosis‐I
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Age-related oocyte aneuploidy occurs as a result of chromosome segregation errors in female meiosis-I and meiosis-II, and is caused by a progressive age-related deterioration of the chromosome segregation machinery. Here, we assess the impact of age upon the kinetochore, the multi-protein structure that forms the link between the chromosome and spindle microtubules. We find that in meiosis-I the outer kinetochore assembles at germinal vesicle breakdown, but that a substantially smaller outer kinetochore is assembled in oocytes from aged mice. We show this correlates with a weaker centromere in aged oocytes and, using nuclear transfer approaches to generate young-aged hybrid oocytes, we show that outer kinetochore assembly always mirrors the status of the centromere, regardless of cytoplasmic age. Finally, we show that weaker kinetochores in aged oocytes are associated with thinner microtubule bundles, that are more likely to be mis-attached. We conclude that progressive loss of the centromere with advancing maternal age underpins a loss of the outer kinetochore in meiosis-I, which likely contributes to chromosome segregation fallibility in oocytes from older females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".