MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366506624 · doi:10.11159/icgre23.154

Determination of Zones at Risk of Flooding During A Breakage of an “El Abiod Ghardaia” Dam

2023· article· en· W4366506624 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sarah Kreri, KEBIR Lahsen Wahib, Abd El Fetah Azzouz

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDam Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakageFlooding (psychology)Environmental scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Algeria, like other countries in the world, has experienced in the last decade, several natural disasters including floods and the breaking of dams, government institutions and others in the world are increasingly aware the phenomenon of dam failure that can cause catastrophic floods involving potential danger to the population.The El Abiod dam, the subject of this study, is vulnerable due to the nature of its design called " Renard effect", could cause its rupture.Oued M'Zab, the subject of this study, constitutes a potential danger because of the violence of its floods, on the one hand, and could have a negative impact on the hydraulic structures if they were to break on the other hand.In order to develop a hydraulic model that simulates the propagation of the flood wave along the sections studied, we adopted a methodology based on the coupling between ARCGIS and HECRAS using HEC-GEORAS.For this for the treatment of this phenomenon, the establishment of a hydraulic model is necessary for the realization of a numerical simulation of the wave of rupture of the Dam El Abiod (maximum peak flow) using the two HEC-RAS 1D and 2D digital models.The main objective of this study is to better explain the potential danger that the dam constitutes if it were to break and to spatialize the extent of the floods in order to map the flood zones which will be a support for the development of the M'Zab valley.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicDam Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207