MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366522725 · doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2023.2.006

Crystal structure, DFT, molecular docking and dynamics simulation studies of 4,4-dimethoxychalcone

2023· article· en· W4366522725 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.V. Yashwanth Gowda, B.L. Vinay, N. Maitra, Srinivasan Kumaraswamy, N.K. Lokanath

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Chemistry Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Mysore
KeywordsChemistryMolecular dynamicsHydrogen bondDocking (animal)Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB)StackingMoleculeIntermolecular forceCrystal structureCrystallographyIn silicoComputational chemistryHydrophobic effectStereochemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the current study, the compound 4,4-dimethoxychalcone (DMC) was structurally studied and analyzed by in silico approach against Mpro to investigate its inhibitory potential. The molecular structure of the compound was confirmed by the single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The crystal structure packing is characterized by various hydrogen bonds, C-H…π and π…π stacking. Intermolecular interactions are quantified by Hirshfeld surface analysis and the electronic structure was optimized by DFT calculations; results are in agreement with the experimental studies. Further, DMC was virtually screened against SARS-CoV-2 main protease (PDB-ID: 6LU7) using molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to identify its inhibitory potential. A significant binding affinity exists between DMC and Mpro with a -6.00 kcal/mol binding energy. A MD simulation of 30ns was carried out; the results predict DMC possessing strong binding affinity and hydrogen-bonding interactions within the active site during the simulation period. Therefore, based on the results of the current investigation, it can be inferred that a DMC molecule may be able to inhibit Mpro of COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Chemistry LettersSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207