Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flight research of the characteristics of trailing vortices, generated by heavy jet transport aircraft in cruising flight, was conducted. Trailing vortex velocities were derived by vectorial differencing of aircraft inertial velocity and true airspeed vectors, and then transforming to the vortex mean axis. Lateral distances between port and starboard vortices were 60–70% of generator wingspan. Vortex core radii were derived. Core pressure states were expanded or diffused. Core diffusion was associated with axial segmentation. Core pressure expansions included magnitudes greater than Euler equilibrium values, with velocity profiles displaying peaked maxima. Associated with these characteristics was vortex core radial instability. Subsequent radial expansion and contraction resulted in a large range of rC values. Vorticity confined to an annular state and discretized into circular arrays of N-point vortices of small rC was prevalent. Radial profiles of vortex velocity were identified and included Rankine (peaked) profiles, Lamb-Oseen, and Burnham-Hallock rounded profiles. Twenty-five percent of identified profiles were rounded. The majority of profiles were peaked, with maxima greater than, or equal to, Rankine values. Temperature gradients inside and outside of core edges were identified: outside, heating occurred, inside, cooling. Outer heating occurred with upstream axial flow. Inner cooling occurred with downstream axial flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it