‘Haec, quae non vidistis oculis, animis cernere potestis’ . Poggio Bracciolini contro Lorenzo Valla fra performance retorica e self-definition.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poggio Bracciolini (1380-1459), segretario apostolico e poi Cancelliere della Repubblica di Firenze, fu indiscusso protagonista del movimento umanistico italiano, distinguendosi anche come maestro d’invettiva. Nell’obiettivo comune di far rivivere l’eredità antica, anche nelle invettive gli Umanisti offrirono numerose rappresentazioni erudite, attraverso ad esempio l’agonale tentativo di aemulatio dei modelli del passato, ma anche l’ostentazione di un significativo virtuosismo retorico. Il presente contributo analizza un episodio della seconda oratio in Laurentium Vallam (c. 1452) del Bracciolini, ove il ricorso alla trattatistica retorica antica in ambito di scrittura figurativa emerge più evidente che in altri loca delle sue invettive e insieme alla riscrittura ‘artistica’ di un famoso passo ciceroniano si staglia come strumento di rappresentazione e distinzione personale per l’umanista di Terranuova.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".