MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366602193 · doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04410-z

Utilization of mechanical power and associations with clinical outcomes in brain injured patients: a secondary analysis of the extubation strategies in neuro-intensive care unit patients and associations with outcome (ENIO) trial

2023· article· en· W4366602193 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Wahlster, Monisha Sharma, Shaurya Taran, James A. Town, Robert D. Stevens, Raphaël Cinotti, Karim Asehoune, Paolo Pelosi, Chiara Robba, Paër-Sélim Abback, Anaïs Codorniu, Giuseppe Citerio, V. Sala, Marinella Astuto, Eleonora Tringali, Daniela Alampi, Monica Rocco, Jessica Giuseppina Maugeri, Agrippino Bellissima, Matteo Filippini, Nicoletta Lazzeri, Andrea Cortegiani, Mariachiara Ippolito, Denise Battaglini, Patrick Biston, Mohamed Fathi Al-Gharyani, Russell Chabanne, Léo Astier, Benjamin Soyer, Samuel Gaugain, Alice Zimmerli, Urs Pietsch, Miodrag Filipovic, Giovanna Brandi, Giulio Bicciato, Ainhoa Serrano, Berta Monleon, Peter Van de Vliet, Benjamin Marcel Gerretsen, Iris Xóchitl Ortiz-Macías, Jun Oto, Noriya Enomoto, Tomomichi Matsuda, Nobutaka Masui, Pierre Garçon, Jonathan Zarka, Wytze J. Vermeijden, Alexander D. Cornet, Sergio Reyes Inurrigarro, Rafael Cirino Lara Domínguez, Maria Mercedes Bellini, Maria Milagros Gomez Haedo, Laura Lamot, Jose Orquera, Matthieu Biais, Delphine Georges, Arvind Baronia, Roberto Carlos Miranda-Ackerman, Francisco José Barbosa‐Camacho, John Porter, Miguel Lopez-Morales, Thomas Geeraerts, Baptiste Compagnon, David Pérez-Torres, Estefanía Prol‐Silva, Hana Basheer Yahya, Ala Khaled, Mohamed Ghula, Cracchiolo Neville Andrea, Palma Maria Daniela, Cristian Deana, Luigi Vetrugno, Manuel J. Rivera Chavez, Rocio Mendoza Trujillo, Vincent Legros, Benjamin Brochet, Olivier Huet, Marie Geslain, Mathieu van der Jagt, Job van Steenkiste, Hazem Ahmed, Alexander Edward Coombs, Jessie Welbourne, Ana Alícia Velarde Pineda, Víctor Hugo Nubert Castillo, Mohammed A. Azab, Ahmed Y. Azzam, David Michael Paul van Meenen, Gilberto Adrian Gasca, Alfredo Arellano, Forttino Galicia-Espinosa, José Carlos García-Ramos, Ghanshyam Yadav, Amarendra Kumar Jha, Vincent Robert-Edan, Pierre-André Rodie-Talbere, Gaurav Jain, Sagarika Panda, Sonika Agarwal, Yashbir Deewan, Syed Tariq Reza, Md. Mozaffer Hossain, Christos Papadas, Vasiliki Chantziara, Chrysanthi Sklavou, Yannick Hourmant, Nicolas Grillot, Romain Pirracchio, Abdelraouf Akkari, Mohamed Abdelaty, Ahmed Hashim, Yoann Launey, Élodie Masseret, Sigismond Lasocki, Soizic Gergaud, Nicolas Mouclier, Sulekha Saxena, Avinash Agrawal, Shakti Bedanta Mishra, Samir Samal, Julio Mijangos, Mattias Haënggi, Mohan Gurjar, Marcus J. Schultz, Callum Kaye, Daniela Agustin Godoy, Pablo Alvarez, Aikaterini Ioakeimidou, Yoshitoyo Ueno, Rafael Badenes, Abdurrahmaan Ali Suei Elbuzidi, Michaël Piagnerelli, Muhammed Elhadi, Jean Digitale, Nicholas Fong, Ricardo Campos Cerda, Norma de la Torre Peredo

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care unitOutcome (game theory)Intensive care medicineEmergency medicineClinical trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence to guide ventilatory targets in acute brain injury (ABI). Recent studies have shown associations between mechanical power (MP) and mortality in critical care populations. We aimed to describe MP in ventilated patients with ABI, and evaluate associations between MP and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this preplanned, secondary analysis of a prospective, multi-center, observational cohort study (ENIO, NCT03400904), we included adult patients with ABI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12 before intubation) who required mechanical ventilation (MV) ≥ 24 h. Using multivariable log binomial regressions, we separately assessed associations between MP on hospital day (HD)1, HD3, HD7 and clinical outcomes: hospital mortality, need for reintubation, tracheostomy placement, and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). RESULTS: We included 1217 patients (mean age 51.2 years [SD 18.1], 66% male, mean body mass index [BMI] 26.3 [SD 5.18]) hospitalized at 62 intensive care units in 18 countries. Hospital mortality was 11% (n = 139), 44% (n = 536) were extubated by HD7 of which 20% (107/536) required reintubation, 28% (n = 340) underwent tracheostomy placement, and 9% (n = 114) developed ARDS. The median MP on HD1, HD3, and HD7 was 11.9 J/min [IQR 9.2-15.1], 13 J/min [IQR 10-17], and 14 J/min [IQR 11-20], respectively. MP was overall higher in patients with ARDS, especially those with higher ARDS severity. After controlling for same-day pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio), BMI, and neurological severity, MP at HD1, HD3, and HD7 was independently associated with hospital mortality, reintubation and tracheostomy placement. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) was greater at higher MP, and strongest for: mortality on HD1 (compared to the HD1 median MP 11.9 J/min, aRR at 17 J/min was 1.22, 95% CI 1.14-1.30) and HD3 (1.38, 95% CI 1.23-1.53), reintubation on HD1 (1.64; 95% CI 1.57-1.72), and tracheostomy on HD7 (1.53; 95%CI 1.18-1.99). MP was associated with the development of moderate-severe ARDS on HD1 (2.07; 95% CI 1.56-2.78) and HD3 (1.76; 95% CI 1.41-2.22). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to high MP during the first week of MV is associated with poor clinical outcomes in ABI, independent of P/F ratio and neurological severity. Potential benefits of optimizing ventilator settings to limit MP warrant further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207