MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4366608243 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104565

A clinically relevant selective ERK-pathway inhibitor reverses core deficits in a mouse model of autism

2023· article· en· W4366608243 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kartikeya Murari, Abdulrahman Abushaibah, Jong M. Rho, Ray W. Turner, Ning Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of CalgaryKids Brain Health NetworkAlberta Children's Hospital Foundation
KeywordsAutismMAPK/ERK pathwayAutism spectrum disorderNeurosciencePhenotypeMedicineSignal transductionPsychologyBiologyCell biologyPsychiatryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK/MAPK) pathway in the brain is hypothesized to be a critical convergent node in the development of autism spectrum disorder. However, it is not clear whether selectively targeting this pathway is beneficial in autism. Here we tested a clinically relevant, selective inhibitor of ERK signaling in a mouse model of idiopathic autism. We report that treating juvenile mice with this inhibitor reduced ERK pathway activation, dose and duration-dependently reduced core disease-modeling deficits in sociability, vocalization and repetitive behavior, and reversed abnormal EEG signals. Further analysis revealed that subchronic treatment did not affect weight gain, locomotion, or neuronal density in the brain. Parallel treatment in the control mice did not alter their phenotype. Together, our data indicate that specifically inhibiting the ERK pathway is beneficial in this model, and suggest that selectively targeting ERK pathway could be a new approach for treating autism.Funding Information: This work was supported by Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Foundation (JMR & NC).Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: Breeder B6 (Jax stock No: 000664) and BTBR (Jax stock No: 002282) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (ME, USA) and maintained at the mouse facility of the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary. Mice were group-housed up to five mice per cage in a humidity- and temperature-controlled room with a 12-h light/dark cycle and were fed ad libitum. Male mice were used as test subjects, as female mice made very few vocalizations in our setting irrespective of genetic backgrounds. Strain and number of mice used were indicated for each experiment. All procedures in this study were performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Canadian Council for Animal Care. The protocol of this study was approved by the Health Sciences Animal Care Committee of the University of Calgary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicine→Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→