State of Charge Estimation of Lithium-ion Battery in Electric Vehicles Using the Smooth Variable Structure Filter: Robustness Evaluation against Noise and Parameters Uncertainties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
State of Charge (SoC) of Lithium-ion battery is a key parameter in battery management systems for electric vehicles. This paper uses the fundamental theory of the smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) and proposes a SoC estimation algorithm for a Manganese Cobalt (NMC) cell with a nominal capacity of 20 Ah. Several tests are conducted considering different types of noise and parameters variation. A nonrandom Gaussian noise is first added to the battery voltage. The maximum root mean square error (RMSE) of the estimated SoC is about 2.8% for a standard deviation of the noise set to 2.6e−3 P.U. The same noise is applied to the battery current and the maximum RMSE of the SoC is obtained as 1.36%. Moreover, an EMI noise is added to the battery voltage and the obtained RMSE of the SoC is about 1.73% for a peak amplitude of the noise set to 0.07 P.U. The convergence of the algorithm is also confirmed under battery parameters variation due to the temperature change. However, its accuracy degrades considerably. Finally, a comparative study is carried out with the extended Kalman filter and shows the superiority of SVSF in terms of accuracy and robustness against measurement noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it