Village Law, Village Government, And Community Empowerment: The Case Study in Sub-district of Kedawung, Cirebon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study aims to analyze the effect of policy implementation of Law Number 6 of 2014 on rural community empowerment in the Kedawung Sub-district, Cirebon Regency. In this study, policy implementation was described in the bureaucratic structure. This descriptive research applied a quantitative approach. The samples used were 100 respondents, and the research method employed was the descriptive analysis method. Data were collected through the distribution of questionnaires as the main instrument. Based on the study results, the influence of communication describing the implementation of the bureaucratic structure explained the policy implementation by 49.13%. The value of the policy implementation variable could be explained largely by the bureaucratic structure. Then, simultaneously, the effect of the policy implementation of Law Number 6 of 2014 on rural community empowerment was 77.87%. Meanwhile, the remaining 22.13% that participated in determining the achievement of community empowerment were affected by other variables outside of this study. This study concludes that The implementation of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages had a significant positive effect on the empowerment of rural communities. The strongest indicator of effect was the indicator that the village government’s policies could increase people’s income. The urgency of research on community empowerment is to increase community participation and independent activities through village funds towards superior HR competitiveness and to support regional autonomy through village government which the Village Law constructs. Keywords: Village government, policy implementation, community empowerment ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh implementasi kebijakan undang-undang nomor 6 tahun 2014 terhadap pemberdayaan masyarakat Desa di Kecamatan Kedawung Kabupaten Cirebon. Implementasi kebijakan dijelaskan dalam struktur birokrasi. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sample yang digunakan sebanyak 100 responden, kemudian metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif analisis. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penyebaran angket sebagai instrumen utama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa pengaruh komunikasi yang menjelaskan implementasi struktur birokrasi menerangkan implementasi kebijakan sebesar 49,13%. Nilai variable implementasi kebijakan dapat dijelaskan paling besar oleh struktur birokrasi. Kemudian secara simultan pengaruh implementasi kebijakan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 terhadap pemberdayaan masyarakat desa sebesar 77,87%. Sedangkan sisanya yang ikut menentukan pencapaian pemberayaan masyarakat sebesar 22,13% ditentukan oleh variabel lain di luar penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap pemberdayaan masyarakat desa. Indikator pengaruh yang paling kuat adalah indikator bahwa kebijakan pemerintah desa dapat meningkatkan pendapatan masyarakat. Urgensi dari penelitian tentang pemberdayaan masyarakat yaitu untuk meningkatkan partisipasi dan aktifitas mandiri masyarakat melalui dana desa menuju daya saing SDM yang unggul, dan mendukungn otonomi daerah melalui pemerintah desa yang dikontruksi UU Desa. Kata Kunci : Pemerintah desa, implementasi kebijakan, pemberdayaan masyarakat
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".