Design Optimization of a Solar Fuel Production Plant by Water Splitting With a Copper‐Chlorine Cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to growing concerns about climate change, the production of renewable fuels has attracted the attention of many researchers recently. Solar energy is an abundant energy resource and a good alternative for the transition toward a more sustainable energy future. Solar energy can be used in many ways to produce solar fuels, for instance, by cracking of hydrocarbons or splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen. Among these methods, the utilization of thermochemical cycles to produce hydrogen from water is one of the most promising ways of producing solar fuel. The copper-chlorine (Cu-Cl) high-performance thermochemical cycle requires relatively lower temperatures compared to other thermochemical cycles and is a good choice for integration with solar power tower systems. In this study, the design and optimization of a standalone plant for hydrogen generation, powered by solar energy, is investigated. To supply the required thermal energy of the Cu-Cl cycle, and also, to store the thermal energy throughout the night, a high-temperature carbonate molten salt (LiNaK) is used. Also, a three-stage super-critical steam Rankine cycle with four feedwater heater subsystems is also integrated into the solar production plant to provide the required electrical needs of the system. Therefore, there is no need for any auxiliary fuel or electricity to have a stable and continuous operation of the solar fuel production plant. Also, a modified heat exchanger network is utilized for the Cu-Cl cycle to use the available waste heat of the cycle and improve the system overall thermal efficiency. The technical and economic performance of the integrated system is investigated, and energy and exergy efficiencies, along with the investment and hydrogen production costs are evaluated. Based on the thermodynamic results, an efficiency of 40.4% for the Cu-Cl cycle and 45.0% for the supercritical Rankine cycle is obtained. The overall energy efficiency of the system is 28.6%, while the exergy efficiency of the overall system is 29.5%. An economic analysis showed that the investment cost of the solar thermochemical plant for a plant capacity of 1524 kg of hydrogen per hour is 516 million dollars. Using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) for multicriteria optimization, the optimum cost of producing hydrogen will be $2.98/kg H 2 while maintaining solar to hydrogen and exergetic efficiencies of 29.2% and 30.1%, respectively. Also, a comparison of the optimized proposed system with other renewable and nonrenewable hydrogen production systems indicates that this method is quite competitive among the other available methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".