MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366729881 · doi:10.46254/sa03.20220257

Automatic Clothes Retriever (ACR)

2023· article· en· W4366729881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rico Wijaya, Iván Alexander, Adira Dzaky, Muhammad Fadhil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingComputer scienceLabrador RetrieverComputer visionMedicineGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a tropical country, Indonesia is located below the equator and has sunshine all year round, the sun's rays have been used to dry wet clothes after people wash their clothes. However, with climate change happening, the current weather is difficult to predict. there are many chances of clothes getting wet due to unexpected rain. Especially now that people are busy at work and clothes are hung unattended. To solve this problem, many projects have been carried out, such as standalone clothes drying system, web-based drying clothes system, and the most advanced is clothes drying system that recycle AC heat waste as source of heat. In this paper, automatic clothes retriever (ACR) equipped with mobile apps-based monitoring system was made. Using the ESP32 as the main controller, LDR, rain sensor, limit switch, motor, fan and heating lamp, the ACR will automatically recognize the weather and retrieve-out or retrieve-in the hanger to protect clothes from unexpected rain. As a result, ACR managed to respond to weather change, by retrieveinning the clothes hanger in 14.82 seconds with 10 Kg clothes on it. During the experiment, the maximum energy consumption of ACR was measured, which is 0.289KWh in one hour with full load in the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207