Integration of ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding with Fecal Egg Count Reduction Testing (FECRT) reveals ivermectin resistance in multiple gastrointestinal nematode species, including hypobiotic Ostertagia ostertagi, in western Canadian beef cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large-scale Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT) was integrated with ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding to investigate anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) parasites in western Canadian beef cattle. The study was designed to detect anthelmintic resistance with the low fecal egg counts that typically occur in cattle in northern temperate regions. Two hundred and thirty-four auction market-derived, fall-weaned steer calves coming off pasture were randomized into three groups in feedlot pens: an untreated control group, an injectable ivermectin treatment group, and an injectable ivermectin/oral fenbendazole combination treatment group. Each group was divided into six replicate pens with 13 calves per pen. Individual fecal samples were taken pre-treatment, day 14 post-treatment, and at monthly intervals for six months for strongyle egg counting and metabarcoding. Ivermectin treatment resulted in an 82.4% mean strongyle-type fecal egg count reduction (95% CI 67.8-90.4) at 14 days post-treatment, while the combination treatment was 100% effective, confirming the existence of ivermectin-resistant GIN. Nemabiome metabarcoding of third-stage larvae from coprocultures revealed an increase in the relative abundance of Cooperia oncophora, Cooperia punctata, and Haemonchus placei at 14 days post-ivermectin treatment indicating ivermectin resistance in adult worms. In contrast, Ostertagia ostertagi third-stage larvae were almost completely absent from day 14 coprocultures, indicating that adult worms of this species were not ivermectin resistant. However, there was a recrudescence of O. ostertagi third stage larvae in coprocultures at three to six months post-ivermectin treatment, which indicated ivermectin resistance in hypobiotic larvae. The calves were recruited from the auction market and, therefore, derived from multiple sources in western Canada, suggesting that ivermectin-resistant parasites, including hypobiotic O. ostertagi larvae, are likely widespread in western Canadian beef herds. This work demonstrates the value of integrating ITS-2 rDNA metabarcoding with the FECRT to enhance anthelmintic resistance detection and provide GIN species- and stage-specific information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".