MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of the False Intensification and Recovery on the Hydrological Drought Internal Propagation

2023· book-chapter· en· W4366769474 on OpenAlexaff
Jiefeng Wu, Iman Mallakpour, Xing Yuan, Huaxia Yao, Gaoxu Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of EnvironmentMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationStreamflowClimatologyHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinGeographyGeologyMeteorologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the influence factors of hydrological drought internal propagation (HDIP) is crucial for early detection of hydrological drought. However, the ‘false recovery’ (FR) during development of hydrological drought and ‘false intensification’ (FI) during the recovery stage were not considered. Here, the definitions of FR and FI were firstly introduced in detail. We define the FR that occurs during the drought intensification period and does not recover the hydrological drought to a normal pre-drought condition, and the FI that occurs during the drought recovery period and does not allow the hydrological drought to develop into maximum drought intensity. Then, we designed a numerical algorithm to assess the roles of the FR and FI during the hydrological drought by comparing two scenarios: 1) considering the FR and FI and 2) not including these two variables. The monthly streamflow and precipitation records with at least 40 years of data for five unregulated and rainfall-driven basins with minimal human activities, located in southern China, were taken for the case study. Three evaluation indicators were considered, i.e., the average of relative error (Ave.RE), coefficient of determination (R2), and the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient, to evaluate the differences in tracking effect of HDIP under considering FR (FI) and without considering FR (FI). Results showed that the FI and the FR influence the hydrological drought intensification and recovery by changing the drought severity. The higher the FR is, the lower severity and slower intensification the drought has. A greater FI leads to a hydrological drought that has larger severity and slower recovery. Considering the substantial influence of FR and FI can significantly improve tracking effect of HDIP. The Ave.RE decreased by 36.01% (24.98%) on average, R2 and NSE increased by 22.22% (14.06%) and 39.19% (24.02%) on average in the development (recovery) period of hydrological drought. The FR (FI) during the hydrological drought is mainly caused by the occurrence of short duration precipitation events (precipitation shortage) in the study basins. Our findings highlight the role of FI and FR in hydrological drought and provide valuable scientific insights for tracking hydrological drought in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207