Features of the Formation of Artistic and Figurative Thinking of Students by Means of Sculpture as a Form of Fine Art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the analysis of scientific literary sources and based on the author's own experience, the author in the article pays attention to the development of sculpture in the modernity, its features, differences from other types of fine art forms. The relevance of the topic is due to the need to train of highly qualified art teachers who have effective teaching methods. One of the stages of such training is the development of spatial thinking among students of pedagogical universities in sculpture classes. This kind of art allows students to go beyond the plane of the page into three-dimensional space. Sculpture classes allow you to see the relationship of different objects with the landscape, air, and each other. The main types of sculpture are characterized, the historical path is described, the essence and specific means inherent in the art of sculpture are revealed and characterized inherent in the art of sculpture. The role of sculpture in the formation of the aesthetics of the environment. The ways of solving creative tasks by means of sculpture, the importance of sculpture in the educational process is highlighted, because students should be guided by the works of high art of both old classical masters and contemporary artists. Familiarization with the world's best works of painting and sculpture contributes to development of artistic and imaginative thinking, formation of students ‘sense of beauty, the ability to understand the beauty of not only art, but also the surrounding world and the surrounding world, the formation of imaginative and spatial thinking. The art of sculpture is characterized as an artistic and figurative reflection of life. It is substantiated how important this important branch of art is in the formation of creatively thinking specialists - artists, future teachers, and teachers of fine arts. It is also shown how sculpture is connected with other art forms, that are important for students who acquire knowledge in the field of fine arts, art, as well as with such disciplines as descriptive geometry drawing, and plastanatomy. It is highlighted how artworks, while decorating our lives, also contribute to the preservation of historical memory contribute to the preservation of the historical memory of peoples, being a kind of a constant in the time line. The work is addressed to scholars, employees of the system of higher artistic and pedagogical education, students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".