MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366779923 · doi:10.32370/ia_2023_03_9

Features of the Formation of Artistic and Figurative Thinking of Students by Means of Sculpture as a Form of Fine Art

2023· article· en· W4366779923 on OpenAlex
Petro Motsenko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Teacher Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSculptureArtLiteral and figurative languageBeautyVisual artsAestheticsFine artVisual arts educationPaintingThe artsPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the analysis of scientific literary sources and based on the author's own experience, the author in the article pays attention to the development of sculpture in the modernity, its features, differences from other types of fine art forms. The relevance of the topic is due to the need to train of highly qualified art teachers who have effective teaching methods. One of the stages of such training is the development of spatial thinking among students of pedagogical universities in sculpture classes. This kind of art allows students to go beyond the plane of the page into three-dimensional space. Sculpture classes allow you to see the relationship of different objects with the landscape, air, and each other. The main types of sculpture are characterized, the historical path is described, the essence and specific means inherent in the art of sculpture are revealed and characterized inherent in the art of sculpture. The role of sculpture in the formation of the aesthetics of the environment. The ways of solving creative tasks by means of sculpture, the importance of sculpture in the educational process is highlighted, because students should be guided by the works of high art of both old classical masters and contemporary artists. Familiarization with the world's best works of painting and sculpture contributes to development of artistic and imaginative thinking, formation of students ‘sense of beauty, the ability to understand the beauty of not only art, but also the surrounding world and the surrounding world, the formation of imaginative and spatial thinking. The art of sculpture is characterized as an artistic and figurative reflection of life. It is substantiated how important this important branch of art is in the formation of creatively thinking specialists - artists, future teachers, and teachers of fine arts. It is also shown how sculpture is connected with other art forms, that are important for students who acquire knowledge in the field of fine arts, art, as well as with such disciplines as descriptive geometry drawing, and plastanatomy. It is highlighted how artworks, while decorating our lives, also contribute to the preservation of historical memory contribute to the preservation of the historical memory of peoples, being a kind of a constant in the time line. The work is addressed to scholars, employees of the system of higher artistic and pedagogical education, students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it