Bibliographic record
Abstract
russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. (winter –): – The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn –; online – c:\users\ken\documents\type\red\rj red.docx -- : PM RECENT ACQUISITIONS, 2018–19 Bridget Whittle Archives and Research Collections / McMaster U. Library Hamilton, on, Canada ls l whittle@mcmaster.ca The previous general update of acquisitions appeared in Russell n.s. (winter –): –. The new listing covers numbers , to , with the latest items arriving in November . There are entries in the correspondents list, totalling letters. Copies of many items were received from other institutions and through the generosity of researchers, to whom McMaster Library is very grateful. The following abbreviations are used: L(s). or l(s). = letter(s); P(s). or p(s). = photocopies. Kenneth Blackwell, Hon. Russell Archivist , sourced the majority of the additions. “Roblat Papers” refers to the Joseph Rotblat Papers in the Churchill Archives Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge University, which kindly provided digital copies. correspondence Adrian, E. D. ls. re Pugwash, –. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Amaldi, Edoardo ls. re Pugwash, . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Beadle, George W. L. re Pugwash. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers, . rec. acq. ,. Beatty, A. Chester L. re Pugwash, . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Born, Max ls. re Pugwash, . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Brandt & Brandt L. from BR re publishing “Is America Becoming Imperialistic ?”, . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. Bronk, D. W. ls. re Pugwash, . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Memo. Re Pugwash, . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Burgers, J. M. L., 1956. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Callinicos, P. G. L. re A. Onassis and Pugwash. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Capron, Victor L. declining to add to Capron’s letter to Khrushchev, which BR has fowarded. . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. Catlin, George Unsent iou with env. to BR. c.. McMaster, George Catlin fonds, Ps. rec. acq. ,. Compton, Arthur H. ls. re Pugwash, –. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. de Broglie, Louis ls. re Pugwash, – . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. de Hevesy, George ls. re Pugwash, –. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Du Bois, W. E. B. L. to BR re an Encyclopedia Africana, Oct. . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. Recent Acquisitions, – c:\users\ken\documents\type\red\rj red.docx -- : PM Eaton, Cyrus ls. from BR re Pugwash, –. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Eliot, T. S. L. to Michael Tippett mentions visiting BR in prison in wwi, . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. Fisher, James L. from BR, thanking him for book about Fulmars, Mar. . Purchase. rec. acq. ,. Field, Marshall L. re Pugwash, . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Hammersmith Bookshop (Ronald Gray) L. from BR re Russian Revolution meeting in Leeds, for possible reprint of What Happened at Leeds (B&R B), . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. Harben, Henry D. L. re Pugwash, . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Hatton, John F. L. from BR, . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. Hawtrey, Ralph ls. on logic, –?. Good scans of ls. earlier photocopied. Churchill Archives Centre. rec. acq. ,. Heald, Johnson & Co. (Black, Jack) L. from BR re Schoenman, Nov. . Courtesy of Anton Felton. rec. acq. ,. Heisenberg, Werner ls. re Pugwash, –. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Hinshelwood, C. N. ls. re Pugwash, –. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Hook, Sidney L. from BR, discussing endowment for research, Sept. . Donation by Jon-Jon Goulian (Hook’s grandson). rec. acq. ,. Infeld, Leopold ls. re Pugwash, – . Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Joliot-Curie, Frédéric ls. re Pugwash, –. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Lavin, Irving ls. and testimonial from BR, –. Lavin was BR’s student. With drawing of BR. Donation by Marilyn Aronberg Lavin. rec. acq. ,. Lichter, Alan R. L. on negative influence of religion, . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. Mikhailusenko, Igor L. from BR expressing sympathy but disagreeing with him on the ussr, July . Internet print. rec. acq. ,. National Jewish Hospital at Denver (Philip Houtz) L. to BR, requesting a book for patients, Aug. . At foot BR instructs Simon and Schuster to send Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare . Purchase. rec. acq. ,. Nehru, Jawaharlal L. to K. Lonsdale, April re Pugwash. Courtesy of Rotblat Papers. rec. acq. ,. Nesmeyanov, A. H. ls. re Pugwash...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".