MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366809676 · doi:10.1353/rss.2015.0013

Russell’s Personal Shorthand

2015· article· de· W4366809676 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kenneth Blackwell

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Science, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)VocabularyClassicsLiteratureComputer scienceHistoryLinguisticsPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 35 (summer 2015): 66–70 The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn 0036–01631; online 1913–8032 c:\users\arlene\documents\rj issues\type3501\rj 3501 061 red.docx 2015-07-10 4:07 PM qextual ptudies RUSSELL’S PERSONAL SHORTHAND Kenneth Blackwell blackwk@mcmaster.ca he use of a personal shorthand, including systematic abbreviations, is found in Russell’s extensive, unpublished notes on lectures he attended in 1893–98, notes on such philosophers as Lotze, Leibniz, Frege and Meinong, and outlines for writings at any age.While special shorthand symbols are few, abbreviations are extensive and managed with raised letters, apostrophes and periods.The system is not always consistent, with some terms having a variety of forms. Context is crucial. His note-taking at lectures required speed and a flexible vocabulary, and he (and we) could easily generate new abbreviations and vary old ones on the fly. Acronyms are few although they include G. A., D. V. and B. V. M. His historical antecedents are unknown, but he had honed his use of a code in the “Greek Exercises” with Greek letters and vocabulary. To abbreviate a singular term, under a single final letter that he superscripted , he would place a dot (or very abbreviated line), but would underline more than one raised letter. Since that is what is seen in the manuscripts, the distinction is followed here with the shorthand coming first to aid consultation . Less extensive lists appeared in Papers 1–6, without the dot or underlining of superscripted letters, and ordered by the expansions. An alternative way to expand Russell’s shorthand is to italicize the expansion. E.g., “accṇ” would become “acceleration”. This approach would have the virtue of searchability, which the use of brackets (“acc[eleratio]n”) lacks. Russell’s shorthand enabled him to write easily understood, literate notes and outlines, and he used the system into old age. An example is this note: “K’s solṇ won’t do, for moral acṇ is in t. & phenal . If, as acns in t., they are detḍ, don’t get freedom, which L’s soul reqṣ.” 1 The cpbr lists are combined below, as is shorthand in the notes and marginalia on Leibniz and Lotze and (thanks to Andy Bone) letters to Ottoline Morrell. While the list assists in expanding Russell’s shorthand, it may not work in reverse. Assume that singular forms of plurals drop the “s”. Standard abbreviations and most names are excluded. 1 “Kant’s solution won’t do, for moral action is in time and phenomenal. If, as actions in time, they are determined, don’t get freedom, which Lotze’s soul requires” (McTaggart’s “Lectures on [the Logic of] Lotze”, Rec. Acq. 385; original at Texas). q= Russell’s Personal Shorthand 67 c:\users\arlene\documents\rj issues\type3501\rj 3501 061 red.docx 2015-07-10 4:07 PM abṭ about abs. absolute absly absolutely abste absolute abstr abstract abstr. abstract acns actions accṇ acceleration ṇ addition adjṣ adjectives adjves adjectives analytal analytical ∠lar angular ∠ṣ angles A. R. Anharmonic Ratio a. v. apparent variable ap. var. apparent variable app. vars. apparent variables applicṇ application aric arithmetic Arḷ’s Aristotle’s Arle Aristotle argṭ argument Aristṇ Aristotelian arithc̣ arithmetic arithmal arithmetical assumpn assumption astronal astronomical attracṇ attraction ax. axiom axes axioms axṣ axioms ∵ because B.V. M. BlessedVirgin Mary betw. between Brỵ Bradley c. g. centre of gravity c. s. curvature of space c. & e. cause and effect cḍ could cḍn’t couldn’t calc. calculus catal categorical cats. categories Charạ Unṣ Characteristica Universalis ⊙ circle ⊙’s circles circums. circumstances classf ṇ classification classif ṇ classification collṇ collection collecṇ collection communicṇ communication compts components concḍ conceived concns conceptions conclns conclusions condal conditional condns conditions configṇ configuration consṇ conservation conscness consciousness const. constant constent constituent constṇ constitution consttes constitutes constts constituents constr. construct constrns constructions contrṇ contradiction contradicns contradictions Coop. Cooperative coords. coordinates cor. corollary corrce correspondence corrḍ correspond corrg̣ corresponding corrṣ corresponds cp. compare cpres compares cpsons comparisons cptve comparative dọ ditto … ditto D. V. DeusVolant DC. Descartes dedṇ deduction dedve deductive defḍ defined defte de...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207