Bibliographic record
Abstract
russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 35 (winter 2015–16): 183 The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn 0036–01631; online 1913–8032 c:\users\ken\documents\type3502\red\rj 3502 053 red.docx 2015-11-12 7:16 PM oeviews RUSSELL’S PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICS G. E. Moore f the philosophical books published in the United Kingdom in 1903, the most important is Mr. Russell’s Principles of Mathematics.1 In this book, Mr. Russell tells us, he has two main objects. His first object is to establish the two very important propositions (1) “that all pure mathematics deals exclusively with concepts definable in terms of a very small number of fundamental logical concepts” and (2) “that all its propositions are deducible from a very small number of fundamental logical principles.” The examination of the principal branches of pure mathematics, which is necessary to establish these two propositions, occupies the last six Parts of the book, which are entitled respectively “Number”, “Quantity”, “Order”, “Infinity and Continuity ”, “Space”, and “Matter and Motion”. In these parts there is much which cannot be easily understood without a special knowledge of Mathematics, and much which has little bearing on philosophy, except so far as it helps to establish Mr. Russell’s two main propositions; but there is much also which is of considerable importance for philosophy, quite apart from its bearing on these two propositions: in particular, Mr. Russell examines very carefully the conceptions of Infinity and Continuity, and attempts to shew that they involve no antinomies. Part i, on the other hand, is devoted to Mr. Russell’s second object—“the explanation of the fundamental concepts which mathematics accepts as indefinable”, and is almost entirely philosophical in its nature. I shall endeavour to give some account (1) of the meaning and consequences of Mr. Russell’s two propositions concerning the relation of Logic and Mathematics (2) of some of the more important points dealt with in Part i and (3) of the theory of Infinity and Continuity. Mr. Russell is eminently qualified for his task by a thorough knowledge of Mathematics and by great philosophical acumen ; and it is certain that no philosopher ought in future to handle any of the subjects discussed in this book, without taking account of the arguments advanced in it.2 1 The Principles of Mathematics. 2 [The remainder of Moore’s very long, unpublished review may be read in the Russell Archives, Rec. Acq. 116.—Ed.] l= ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".