MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366810265 · doi:10.1353/rss.2005.0010

Index to Russell’s Which Way to Peace?

2005· article· en· W4366810265 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roma Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisarmamentIsolationismLeagueLawEconomic historyWorld War IIPolitical scienceForeign policyHistoryPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

_Russell_ journal (home office): E:CPBRRUSSJOURTYPE2502\INDEXWWP.252 : 2006-02-27 11:52 ibliographies, rchival nventories, ndexes INDEX TO RUSSELL’S WHICH WAY TO PEACE? R H Summerfields, The Glade Escrick, York  , .. @.. he only edition of Which Way to Peace? is that of Jonathan Cape, pubTlished in London in . It had three printings.—Ed. Abrams, Ray H. n. Abyssinia , –, ,  Franco-British relations  and League of Nations – motives for defending , ,  Mussolini’s attack preventable?  Aden ,  aerodromes, as targets – aeroplanes as deterrent to military action ,  development, and America  and international authority  in warfare – see also aviation, and international authority aggression, of Germany  aggressor difficulties of definition – siding against – agrobiology  air raids , , –, ,  see also battles, air air strategy –,  air supremacy  German – air warfare – exclusive to world government  see also air raids; battles, air alliances  British-Continental, argument against  as cause(s) of war  coercion of  as deterrent(s) to war , –,  allies, need for, and partial pacifism  Alsace-Lorraine  Amberley, John Russell, Viscount essay on league of nations  America attitudes to war – and civilization  and Europe – and immigration – and League of Nations  neutrality , – policy of isolationism – risk of air raids  anarchy  measures to prevent  principle of nationality promoting  Anglo-German Naval Agreement () [“Naval Treaty”]  Anglo-Persian Oil Company  russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s.  (winter –): – The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U.  - _Russell_ journal (home office): E:CPBRRUSSJOURTYPE2502\INDEXWWP.252 : 2006-02-27 11:52    anti-aircraft guns  apathy at drift towards war – Archdukes  armaments ,  in Europe  fallacy of advocating  increase of , , – see also disarmament armaments industry intrigues  nationalization – armed forces abolition of – increased strength, and war prevention – role after air bombardment – and weaponry, under international law  see also Royal Air Force; Royal Navy armistice , – Army, Navy and Air Force Gazette , – Asiatic influx  Asquith, Herbert  Augustus, Emperor  Australia, and population  Austria, and Continental alliances  aviation, and international authority – see also aeroplanes Baku, oil for Russia  Baldwin, Stanley  battles, air –, – battleships  Belgium  argument for defending  British pledge to defend  “believing nonsense”  Bench of Bishops (in Lords)  Berlin, its risk of air raids  Birkenhead, Lord (“F. E. Smith”)  birth control, and economic welfare  Bismarck , , ,  Blue Nile Abyssinian question and  Blum, Léon –,  Boers gold mines, and cruelty  Bolsheviks/Bolshevism , ,  bombardment(s), forecasts of effects –, – bombing capacity, of potential enemies – bombs – Bratt, Major K. A. – “Bray, Vicar of”  Britain role in League of Nations , ,  support for alliance with Germany – see also England British Admiralty ,  British Empire defence of , , – immigration – potential losses – profit-and-loss account – see also imperialism British Government attitude to Germany  neutrality, difficulties of – uncertainty in policy – British Guiana  British naval policy – see also Royal Navy Byron  Caesar, Julius conquest of Gaul  cannibalism  capital investment in crown colonies , – Capone, Al  Carlyle, Thomas  Carson, Lord Edward  Castlereagh, Robert Stewart, Viscount  Catholicism, sixteenth-century  Catholics, German  Cavour, Camillo Benso, conte di  censorship of bad news  Ceuta (North Africa) ,  Chamberlain, Joseph  character-training for peace – Charlton, Air Comm. –, , – _Russell_ journal (home office): E:CPBRRUSSJOURTYPE2502\INDEXWWP.252 : 2006-02-27 11:52 Index to Which Way to Peace?  chemical industry as armaments  and international authority  The Chemical War (German manual ) – Chicago, and gangsters – child-rearing, and moral education – China population and freedom  Christianity , ,  Churchill, Winston  City, the and Germany –,  civil defence –,  civil war – intervention in  potential for, in Poland  in Spain  civilian air drill  civilians  casualties, for a cause – and cost of war  effect of modern war on  war work  civilization(s), threat to –,  class war  Clausewitz, Karl von  clergy, glorifying war – “cold steel” – collective security  meaning of policy – vs. pacifism , –,  requisites for ,  colonial administration, BR’s scheme for n. Committee of Experts – common sense , ,  Communism  Communists and class , – and collective security  effects of victory or defeat on  complete pacifism  movement in France  conquest ,  conscientious objectors – conscription ,  consequentialism – Conservative Party , – two trends of opinion – Constantinople  construction industry, in crown colonies  Continental alliances, and war – co-operation and individuality  Copenhagen ,  cowardice, and pacifism  Croix de Feu  crown colonies capital investment in , – disposing of –, , , ,  employment opportunities  cruelty, doctrines of – Cyprus ,  Czechoslovakia ,  Daily Worker  Danzig  death penalty for refusal to fight –,  defence, aeroplane weak in – defence against air raids – defence of colonies, case for war – defences, morale-boosting – defensive action for peace – opposing claims...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicIndian History and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207