Association of Alopecia Areata with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated melanocyte-related pathogenesis in alopecia areata (AA) may cause sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, the relation between AA and SNHL has been unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate this association between AA and SNHL. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and searched MEDLINE and Embase on July 25, 2022, for cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies that examined the association of AA with SNHL. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate their risk of bias. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to obtain the mean differences in frequency-specific hearing thresholds between AA patients and age-matched healthy controls and the pooled odds ratio for SNHL in relation to AA. RESULTS: We included 5 case-control studies and 1 cohort study, with none of them rated with high risk of biases. The meta-analysis showed AA patients had significantly higher mean differences in pure-tone hearing thresholds at 4,000 Hz and 12,000-12,500 Hz. The meta-analysis also found increased odds for SNHL among patients with AA (OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 2.06-4.89; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: AA is associated with an increase of SNHL, especially at high frequencies. Otologic consultation may be indicated if AA patients present with hearing loss or tinnitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".