MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366825817 · doi:10.1680/jenes.22.00047

Combinatory effects of microplastics and emerging contaminants on alga <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii</i>

2023· article· en· W4366825817 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jennifer Zhen Ni Goh, Christophyr Kai Xiang Yeoh, Tianhua Wang, Yonghai Lu, Oon Hui Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlamydomonas reinhardtiiPhotosynthesisMicroplasticsEnvironmental chemistryAlgal bloomBiomass (ecology)AlgaeChemistryContaminationChlorophyll fluorescencePollutantChlorella vulgarisBotanyBiologyEcologyBiochemistryOrganic chemistryPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In oceans today, there is much concern about the effects of microplastics (MPs) and other emerging contaminants (ECs). Here, the authors investigated the combinatory effects of the MPs poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and acrylates/C10–30 alkyl acrylates cross-polymer (AC) (which are commonly found in face wash), together with 2-phenoxyethanol (an EC commonly used in soaps). The model photosynthetic unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was used to study the potential of these pollutants to initiate algal blooms. It was shown that AC alone resulted in a greater decline in algal biomass as compared with PVC in the short term (14 days). While algal cultures exposed to PVC registered the highest increase in concentrations of the chlorophyll a pigment, it was the combinatory effects of each MP and 2-phenoxyethanol that were the most pronounced in terms of the large increase in algal biomass and the formation of extracellular polymeric substances. Proliferative growths of C. reinhardtii after prolonged exposure to AC–EC contaminants show potential for initiating algal blooms in aquatic environments. Hence, AC should be considered for regulation of waste water removal into water bodies, and other combinations of MPs and ECs should also be investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207