MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366957367 · doi:10.1109/tns.2023.3269888

Corrections for Fluorescence and Charge-Sharing Effects to Bremsstrahlung Spectra for a Hyperspectral Pixelated CZT X-Ray Detector

2023· article· en· W4366957367 on OpenAlexaff
Oakley Clark, Matt Wilson, Philip Evans, Emma Harris, S. Pani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of Surrey
KeywordsCharge sharingBremsstrahlungPhysicsDetectorPhotonMonte Carlo methodPhoton countingHyperspectral imagingPhoton energyOpticsEnergy (signal processing)Computational physicsAtomic physicsRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Monte Carlo model was developed to simulate the response of a pixelated hyperspectral CdZnTe (CZT) X-ray detector. The first part of the simulation was carried out using Geant4 to obtain a list of energy depositions inside the CZT crystal. The second part of the simulation used charge transport equations to calculate the size of the electron charge cloud, as it drifts under the influence of an electric field to be read out. Experimentally acquired data from an Am-241 source with the high energy X-ray imaging technology (HEXITEC) detector were compared to simulated data, and good agreement was found. The model was used to investigate the energy dependence of fluorescence and charge-sharing effects. The probability of producing an escaped fluorescence photon was quantified as a function of primary photon energy. As expected, at primary photon energies just above the K-edge of Cd, there was a greater chance of producing an escaped fluorescence photon, and this probability decreased as the primary photon energy increased. The probability of an event being shared across multiple pixels as a function of primary photon energy was quantified. It was found that as the primary photon energy was increased, there was a greater chance of producing an event shared across multiple pixels. The detector response to a Bremsstrahlung spectrum was simulated. Using previous results, fluorescence and charge-sharing effects were corrected for, giving a corrected spectrum in good agreement with the input spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207