MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366960592 · doi:10.5751/ace-02410-180117

Metabarcoding fecal samples to investigate spatiotemporal variation in the diet of the endangered Westland Petrel ( Procellaria westlandica )

2023· article· en· W4366960592 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marina Querejeta, Marie‐Caroline Lefort, Vincent Bretagnolle, Stéphane Boyer

Bibliographic record

VenueAvian Conservation and Ecology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUnitec Institute of Technology
KeywordsForagingThreatened speciesEndangered speciesPetrelBiologyEcologyPredationFur sealSeabirdHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As top predators, seabirds can be indirectly impacted by climate variability and commercial fishing activities through changes in marine communities. However, high mobility and foraging behavior enable seabirds to exploit prey distributed patchily in time and space. Despite this environmental adaptability, seabirds are the world’s most threatened birds and there is, therefore, an urge to acquire information about their ecological and foraging requirements through the study of their diet. Traditionally, the diet of seabirds is assessed through the morphological identification of prey remains in regurgitates. This sampling method is invasive for the bird and limited in terms of taxonomic resolution. However, the recent progress in DNA-based approaches is now providing a noninvasive means to more comprehensively and accurately characterize animal diets. We used a noninvasive metabarcoding approach to characterize the diet of the Westland Petrel (<em>Procellaria westlandica</em>), which is an endangered burrowing species, endemic to the South Island of New Zealand. We collected 99 fresh fecal samples in 2 different seasons and in 2 different subcolonies. Our aim was to describe the Westland Petrel’s diet and to investigate seasonal and spatial variations to their diet to understand the feeding requirements of this species. We also specifically investigated potential links with the New Zealand fishery industry to inform efficient conservation practices. Our noninvasive dietary DNA (dDNA) approach also highlighted significant differences in diet between seasons (incubation vs. chick-rearing season) and between sampling sites (two subcolonies 1.5 km apart). This suggests plasticity in the foraging strategy of the Westland Petrel. We found that amphipods were the most common prey, followed by cephalopods, and fish. Our findings could be the result of natural foraging behavior but also suggest a close link between the composition of prey items and New Zealand’s commercial fishing activities. In particular, the high abundance of amphipods could be the result of Westland Petrels feeding on discarded fisheries waste (fish guts). This close relationship to New Zealand’s fisheries may put stress on the resilience of the Westland Petrel. This valuable knowledge about Westland Petrel foraging needs is key to design efficient conservation plans for this iconic species. We illustrate how dDNA can inform the conservation of endangered or at-risk species that have elusive foraging behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvian Conservation and EcologySame topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207