In Silico Analyses of All STAT3 Missense Variants Leading to Explore Divergent AD-HIES Clinical Phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome (AD-HIES) is linked to dominant negative mutations of the STAT3 protein whose molecular basis for dysfunction is unclear and presenting with a variety of clinical manifestations with only supportive treatment. To establish the relationship between the impact of STAT3 mutations in different domains and the severity of the clinical manifestations, 105 STAT3 mutations were analyzed for their impact on protein stability, flexibility, function, and binding affinity using in Silico approaches. Our results showed that 73% of the studied mutations have an impact on the physicochemical properties of the protein, altering the stability, flexibility and function to varying degrees. In particular, mutations affecting the DNA binding domain (DBD) and the Src Homology 2 (SH2) have a significant impact on the protein structure and disrupt its interaction either with DNA or other STAT3 to form a heterodomain complex, leading to severe clinical phenotypes. Collectively, this study suggests that there is a close relationship between the domain involving the mutation, the degree of variation in the properties of the protein and the degree of loss of function ranging from partial loss to complete loss, explaining the variability of clinical manifestations between mild and severe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".