MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366964844 · doi:10.21608/mnj.2022.295564

Relationship between Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Status and Balance Confidence among Geriatric Patients

2022· article· en· W4366964844 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aml Ibrahim, Neamit Elemam, Heba Abd El-Latif Mohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueMansoura Nursing Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)Cognitive impairmentAudiologyConfidence intervalCognitionMedicinePsychologyGerontologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hearing impairment is a growing public healthcare issue in the world that increases with age. It has asignificant impairment in all aspects of life especially among geriatric patients and its increased severity is directlyassociated with greater negative consequences. Aim: Assess the relationship between hearing impairment andcognitive status and balance confidence among geriatric patients. Method: A descriptive research design wasutilized with a purposive sample of 112 geriatric patients diagnosed with hearing impairment and met the inclusioncriteria. Setting: This study was conducted in the outpatient audiology clinic of otolaryngology department at MainMansoura University Hospital. Tools: Data was collected using three tools; Geriatric Patient’s DemographicCharacteristics and Clinical Data Structured Interview Schedule, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale andActivities-Specific Balance Confidence scale. Results: This study was reported that, 57.1% of the studied subjectshad mild grade of hearing impairment, whereas 34.8% of them had a moderate grade of hearing impairment. As forcognitive status, 43.8% of the studied subjects had mild cognitive function impairment, 19.6% of them had amoderate cognitive function impairment. While, 71.4% of the studied subjects had a high level of balanceconfidence, 28.6% of them had a moderate level of balance confidence. A statistical significant relation foundbetween the severity of hearing impairment and the studied subjects’ age, sex, marital status, level of education andwork before retirement p ≤ 0.05 respectively. A highly statistically significant negative relation between the severityof hearing impairment of the studied subjects and their cognitive status and balance confidence p ≤ 0.01 respectively.Conclusion: It can be concluded that, mild grade of hearing impairment is the most prevalent grade among studiedsubjects followed by moderate grade. Severe grade of hearing impairment was found in older age group than theyounger age group, in female than males and in those who are illiterate. More than one third of the studied subjectswho have moderate grade of hearing impairment have moderate cognitive function impairment and all the studiedsubjects who have severe grade of hearing impairment have moderate level of balance confidence.Recommendations: Assess the geriatric patients' knowledge and skills they utilize to overcome hearing impairmentproblems and design an educational program for them about treatment adherence and using hearing aids to improvetheir cognitive function, psychosocial status and balance confidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMansoura Nursing JournalSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207