The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Fatty Acids Intake with Osteoarthritis Symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: There is limited knowledge on the level of dietary intake of Saturated Fatty Acids (SFA) and Trans Fatty Acids (TFA) and physical activity of patients with Knee Osteoarthritis (OA).In this study, we monitored and compared the level of SFA and TFA dietary intake, and physical activity in adults with and without knee OA.We also investigate the relationship between nutrient intake and physical activity with OA symptoms.Design/Setting/Participants: Sixty patients diagnosed with knee OA and 50 healthy subjects were recruited in this crosssectional study.Nutrient intakes were collected using a 3-day dietary record, and number of steps was monitored using Fitbit device.The clinical diagnosis was assessed using performance-based measures of 6-minute walk (6MWT) and stair test, and self-reported measures of pain, stiffness, and function.Results: Patients had fewer steps/day (p=0.04) and spent less time in very active movements (p=0.02)than healthy controls.When nutrient intake was adjusted for sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), and age, patients with OA had significantly (p<0.01)higher intake of SFA, and TFA than healthy controls.Steps/day had a significant (p<0.01)association with all self-reported and performance-based measures.SFA was significantly (p<0.05)associated with pain, stiffness, and 6MWT, and TFA was significantly (p<0.05)associated with pain, function score, and 6MWT. Conclusion:Walking more and consuming lower amount of SFA and TFA were associated with lower pain and higher physical function scores.Increasing walking, and reducing SFA and TFA should be explored as potential interventions for patients with knee OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".