The relationship of cognitive impairment and clinical manifestations of myasthenia gravis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND. There are many studies in the literature suggesting that cognitive impairment is more pronounced in patients with myasthenia gravis compared with healthy people, but there is no explanation of the reasons and mechanisms. However, the reverse character the influence of intellectual-mnestic disorders on the course of myasthenia gravis has not been studied enough. AIM. To compare clinical, anamnestiс, laboratory and instrumental data in patients with myasthenia gravis according to the presence or absence of cognitive impairment. MATERIAL AND METHODS. 61 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of myasthenia gravis were divided into 2 groups according to the Montreal cognitive test. Patients scoring 25 or less were assigned to the first group, those scoring 26 points or more to the second group. A comparative assessment was made according to the myasthenia gravis impairment index, age of onset, duration of the disease, duration of hospitalization, severity of myasthenia gravis according to clinical scales, body mass index, electroneuromyography data, levels of antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor and skeletal muscles, and daily doses of the drugs received. RESULTS. In the 1st group, there was a significantly higher score on the Generalised Disorders subscale of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index; the severity of Quantitative myasthenia gravis score was significantly higher in the 1st group than in the 2nd both for the total score and for the Musculoskeletal Lesions subscale. On average, 49 mg more pyridostigmine bromide was required in the first group, while the average body mass index was significantly lower in the first group. CONCLUSION. The presence of a cognitive deficit in patients with myasthenia gravis may worsen the clinical picture of the disease, which should be taken into account by clinicians, especially in elderly patients, who are at increased risk of developing cognitive disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".