MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366977004 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000207373

Teaching NeuroImage: Hyperglycemia-Induced Occipital Lobe Seizures

2023· article· en· W4366977004 on OpenAlexafffund
Robin Bessemer, Keng Yeow Tay, Adrian Budhram

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological and metabolic disorders
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersLondon Health Sciences FoundationAcademic Medical Organization of Southwestern OntarioLondon Health Sciences Centre
KeywordsOccipital lobeEpilepsyPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceTemporal lobeElectroencephalographyAudiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 64-year-old man was admitted with right-sided headache and confusion.He experienced episodes of left-sided flashing lights evolving to left-beating nystagmus with impaired awareness, suggesting right occipital lobe-onset seizures, for which levetiracetam was prescribed.Between episodes, he had left homonymous hemianopia.Brain MRI showed right occipital lobe swelling with cortical T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity and diffusion restriction (Figure).Blood glucose on admission was 21.8 mmol/L (normal: 3.4-11 mmol/L) and HbA1C was 12.8%, indicating a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and raising concern for hyperglycemia-induced occipital lobe seizures. 1,2Testing for alternative etiologies including CSF bacterial culture, viral PCRs, cytology, and autoimmune encephalitis antibodies, as well as serum anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), was negative.After blood glucose normalization, his symptoms resolved.Repeat brain MRI 8 weeks later was unremarkable (Figure).Occipital lobe seizures are a rare but characteristic manifestation of hyperglycemia.Glycemic control generally results in their resolution, emphasizing the importance of prompt diagnosis. 1,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicNeurological and metabolic disordersFrench-language works237,207