Association Between the Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index and Prognosis in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multicentre Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Risk stratification is fundamental in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), defined as pulmonary arterial pulse pressure divided by right atrial pressure (RAP), is a hemodynamic index shown to predict acute right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in several settings. Our objective was to test the prognostic utility of PAPi in a diverse multicentre cohort of patients with PAH. Methods: A multicentre retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with a new diagnosis of PAH on right heart catheterization between January 2016 and December 2020 was undertaken across 4 major centres in Canada. Hemodynamic data, clinical data, and outcomes were collected. The association of PAPi and other hemodynamic variables with mortality was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic curves and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: = 0.02). In a multivariable model including age, sex, body mass index, and functional class, a low PAPi was associated with mortality at 1 year (area under the curveof 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.74). However, high RAP (> 8 mm Hg) was similarly predictive of mortality, with an area under the curve of 0.65. Conclusion: PAPi was associated with mortality in a large incident PAH cohort. However, the discriminative value of PAPi was not higher than that of RAP alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".