Breastfeeding in adolescent mothers-premature infant dyads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown that the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is shorter in adolescent mothers and preterm infants. The objective was to identify the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding, its survival curve and associated factors, in adolescent mother-premature infant dyads and to compare two hospitals aligned or not with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative up to 6 months.Methods: Follow-up and comparative study. Carried out in two reference hospitals (certified as Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative and Non-certified). The participants were 67 adolescent mothers and 69 premature infants hospitalized in Neonatal Unit where the follow-up began in all the dyads with the informed consent. Data collection was carried out in clinical files and interview of adolescent mothers in the hospitals and by telephone in the follow-up. (February 2016 to March 2017). The variables were Exclusive breastfeeding, sociodemographic, perinatal and clinical status of the premature infants. The statistical analysis was descriptive and we applied Kaplan-Meier and Pearson's r Test (significance p ≤ .05).Results: The exclusive breastfeeding was 27.1%, 63.8%, 66.7%, 48.1% and 26.3% in internment, discharge, 15 days post-discharge, third and sixth month of life, respectively. The exclusive breastfeeding survival: at Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (40%, 30 days post discharge) and Non-Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (30%, 15 days post discharge) (p ≤ .05). Cessation of breastfeeding due to the perception of low milk production (15 days post-discharge, r = .556, p ≤ .05).Conclusions: The prevalence and the survival curve of exclusive breastfeeding are low, especially in Non-Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, and the perception of low milk production. The health system efforts are required to initiate and continue exclusive breastfeeding according with WHO recommendations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".