MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366988314 · doi:10.3390/met13050841

Effect of Quench Tempering on Hydrogen Embrittlement and Corrosion Behavior of X100 Pipeline Steel

2023· article· en· W4366988314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMetals · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharpy impact testMaterials scienceTemperingMetallurgyCorrosionHydrogen embrittlementAusteniteEmbrittlementTexture (cosmology)Quenching (fluorescence)HydrogenIndentation hardnessVickers hardness testMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behavior of X100 pipeline steel (Ref) was investigated after various heat treatments, including one-step austenitizing at 880 °C (HT3), 830 °C (HT2), and 780 °C (HT1) for 90 min, oil quenching to room temperature, tempering at 600 °C for 30 min, and air cooling to room temperature. Potentiodynamic polarisation was performed to assess the electrochemical corrosion behavior, while the Charpy impact test and Vickers microhardness measurement were performed to assess the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility before and after hydrogen charging. SEM, EBSD, and EDS were used to further characterize the fractured surface and crystallographic texture of specimens, while XRD was used to evaluate the macro-texture and corrosion products. The results of the Charpy impact and hardness tests showed that the high hardness and low impact energy values in the Reference and HT3 specimens were linked to a higher susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement, indicating that the hardness values and Charpy impact energy, respectively, increased and decreased with a decrease in the hydrogen embrittlement resistance. The micro-texture results from the EBSD analysis showed that the HT3 and Ref. specimens had higher Kernel average misorientation (KAM) values and higher deformed grains fractions than those of the HT2 and HT1 specimens, resulting in lower corrosion resistance. The HT2 specimen had an optimal combination of beneficial ({110}, {111}, {332}) and harmful texture components ({100}), showing that corrosion resistance can be improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it