MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366998168 · doi:10.1101/2023.04.21.23288646

The Bilateral Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Children (BRICC) trial: a two-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in young children undergoing cardiac surgery

2023· preprint· en· W4366998168 on OpenAlexaff
Nigel E Drury, Carin van Doorn, Rebecca Woolley, Rebecca J. Amos-Hirst, Rehana Bi, Collette M. Spencer, Kevin Morris, James Montgomerie, John Stickley, Adrian Crucean, Alicia Gill, Matt Hill, Ralf J. M. Weber, Lukáš Najdekr, Andris Jankevics, Andrew D. Southam, Gavin R. Lloyd, Osama Jaber, Imre Kassai, Guiseppe Pelella, Natasha Khan, Phil Botha, David J. Barron, Melanie Madhani, Warwick B. Dunn, Natalie Ives, Paulus Kirchhof, Timothy J. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of LeicesterBritish Heart FoundationMedical Research CouncilUniversity of BirminghamQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Charity
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialTetralogy of FallotCardiac surgeryIschemic preconditioningAnesthesiaSurgeryInternal medicineIschemiaHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Previous trials evaluating remote ischaemic preconditioning in children undergoing cardiac surgery showed mixed results. We sought to determine whether adequately delivered bilateral preconditioning is cardioprotective in young children, with or without cyanosis, undergoing surgery. Methods Prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial at two UK centres. Children aged 3-36 months undergoing tetralogy of Fallot repair or ventricular septal defect closure were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bilateral preconditioning or sham intervention. Participants were followed up until hospital discharge or 30 days. The primary outcome was area under the curve for high-sensitivity troponin-T in the first 24 hours after surgery, analysed by intention-to-treat. Right atrial biopsies were obtained in selected patients. Trial registration: ISRCTN12923441 . Results Between 24 October 2016 and 8 December 2020, 120 eligible children were randomised to receive either bilateral preconditioning (n=60) or sham intervention (n=60). Participants had a median age of 7 months and 42 (35%) were female. The primary outcome, area under the curve for hs-troponin-T was higher in the preconditioning group (mean: 70.0±50.9µg/L/hr, n=56) than in controls (mean: 55.6±30.1µg/L/hr, n=58), p=0.04. Sub-group analyses did not show a differential treatment effect by oxygen saturations (p interaction =0.25) but showed evidence of differential treatment effect by underlying defect (p interaction =0.04). Myocardial metabolism, quantified in atrial biopsies, and secondary outcomes were not different between randomised groups. Conclusions Bilateral remote ischemic preconditioning does not attenuate myocardial injury in children undergoing surgical repair for congenital heart defects, and there was evidence of potential harm in unstented tetralogy of Fallot.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207