Pancreas-derived DPP4 is not essential for glucose homeostasis under metabolic stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mice systemically lacking dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) have improved islet health, glucoregulation, and reduced obesity with high-fat diet (HFD) feeding compared to wild-type mice. Some, but not all, of this improvement can be linked to the loss of DPP4 in endothelial cells (ECs), pointing to the contribution of non-EC types. The importance of intra-islet signaling mediated by α to β cell communication is becoming increasingly clear; thus, our objective was to determine if β cell DPP4 regulates insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in HFD-fed mice by regulating the local concentrations of insulinotropic peptides. Using β cell double incretin receptor knockout mice, β cell- and pancreas-specific Dpp4 −/− mice, we reveal that β cell incretin receptors are necessary for DPP4 inhibitor effects. However, although β cell DPP4 modestly contributes to high glucose (16.7 mM)-stimulated insulin secretion in isolated islets, it does not regulate whole-body glucose homeostasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".