Determinants of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Adult Patients After Fontan Palliation: Usefulness of Ultrasound Transient Elastography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fontan-associated liver disease is an increasing concern. Our aim was to assess prevalence and predictors of advanced liver fibrosis with a specific focus on utility of liver stiffness measurement by ultrasound transient elastography. METHODS: A total of 97 adult Fontan patients (55% male, median age: 23.1 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 18.7-30.6); 92 (95%) were evaluated with transient elastography, and 50 (52%) underwent transjugular liver biopsy. Advanced liver fibrosis was defined as congestive hepatic fibrosis score 3 or 4. RESULTS: Only 4 patients (4%) had liver stiffness values < 10 kilopascal (kPa). Liver-stiffness measurements correlated weakly with peak oxygen uptake on exercise testing and Fontan pressure but not with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding INR (MELD-XI) score or spleen size. Serial follow-up liver stiffness measurements in 73 clinically stable patients showed large variability among individual patients. Advanced liver fibrosis was present in 35 of 50 (70%) patients on liver biopsy and was associated to MELD-XI-Score ≥ 11 and splenomegaly but not to liver-stiffness measurements. Advanced liver fibrosis was not associated with patient age or time since Fontan operation but with younger age at completion of Fontan (3.7 years, IQR: 2.3-6.3 vs 6.8 years; IQR: 3.5-12.1; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, advanced liver fibrosis was present in the majority of adult Fontan patients. Liver stiffness as measured by transient elastography was not associated with the degree of liver fibrosis. Because of its high variability on serial measurements, it seems not to be useful for clinical decision making. The unexpected finding that younger age at completion of Fontan was associated with advanced liver fibrosis merits further evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".