MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characteristics and Outcomes of Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Other Cutaneous Malignancies in Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Systematic Review

2023· review· en· W4367047659 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Jinhyung Kim, Abrahim Abduelmula, Jenna Mistry, Asfandyar Mufti, R. Gary Sibbald

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Skin & Wound Care · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWestern UniversityMcMaster University Medical CentreToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpidermolysis bullosaDermatologyBasal cellPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To identify cases and summarize outcomes of cutaneous malignancies in patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched on February 8, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Original observational or experimental studies with cases of cutaneous malignancy in patients with inherited EB were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by two reviewers in duplicate. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 87 articles with 367 patients were included in this systematic review. Squamous cell carcinomas were the most common malignancy (94.3%) with a median survival of 60 months. The presence of metastasis was investigated at diagnosis in 77 patients; 18.8% of patients had detectable metastasis. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma with metastasis at diagnosis had significantly shorter median survival (16.8 months) than those without (72 months; P = .027). The remission rate was 47.6%. At the end of follow-up, 15.1% were alive with disease, and 41.6% were deceased. Other malignancies included malignant melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. The most common initial modes of management were excisions (71.9%) and amputations (17.6%). Other modes included chemotherapy (4.6%), radiation (3.9%), and no treatment (2.6%). The overall rate of recurrence or new lesions was 38.8%, with a median time of 16 months to recurrence or new lesions. Immediate recurrence was lowest following amputation (4.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in median survival among initial excision, amputation, and all other modes combined ( P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Squamous cell carcinomas in patients with EB have a high likelihood of metastasis and mortality. Surgical excision is the most common intervention. There are no significant differences in survival among different initial management options. There is a need for research that documents and monitors outcomes of the treatment options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.006
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Skin & Wound CareSame topicSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207