Radiochemical Investigations for Radiopharmaceutical Nuclear Medicine at JINR Laboratory of Nuclear Problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, radiopharmaceuticals have been increasingly used for diagnostics and treatment of cancer. In addition to a biological vector, a modern radiopharmaceutical includes a chelator that binds the radionuclide, as well as a linker for connecting the vector and the chelator. The development of such an approach requires the improvement of methods for obtaining and purifying radionuclides, and the development of methods for the synthesis of radiopharmaceuticals, i.e., preparative direction. It is also necessary to search for new vectors and chelators. This implies the development of methods for analyzing the properties of radiopharmaceuticals in general, as well as their precursors, i.e., analytical direction. In this review, we describe the prerequisites for successfully solving a wide range of challenges in these two areas of nuclear medicine at the Scientific and Experimental Department of Nuclear Spectroscopy and Radiochemistry of the Laboratory of Nuclear Problems of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (LNP JINR). These prerequisites are due to rich experience in obtaining the widest range of radionuclides and their application for various spectrometric studies. Both the past and present works on radiopharmaceutical topics carried out in the department are described, and ways of future development are outlined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".