MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4367059179 · doi:10.1101/2023.04.25.23289108

Differences in AD-related pathology profiles across APOE groups

2023· preprint· en· W4367059179 on OpenAlexafffund
Cassandra Morrison, Mahsa Dadar, Farooq Kamal, D. Louis Collins

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlzheimer Society Research ProgramAlzheimer SocietyFondation Brain CanadaAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
KeywordsApolipoprotein EPsychologyPathologyMedicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The apolipoprotein (APOE) e4 allele is a known risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), while the e2 allele is thought to be protective against AD. Few studies have examined the relationship between brain pathologies, atrophy, and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and APOE status in those with the e2e4 genotype and results are inconsistent for those with an e2 allele. METHODS: We analyzed Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging participants that had APOE genotyping and at least one of the following metrics: regional WMH load, ventricle size, hippocampal (HC) and entorhinal cortex (EC) volume, amyloid level (i.e., AV-45), and phosphorylated tau (pTau). Participants were divided into one of four APOE allele profiles (E4=e4e4 or e3e4; E2=e2e2 or e2e3; E3=e3e3; or E24=e2e4, Fig.1). Linear mixed models examined the relationship between APOE profiles and each pathology (i.e., regional WMHs, ventricle size, hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volume, amyloid level, and phosphorylated tau measures). while controlling for age, sex, education, and diagnostic status at baseline and over time. RESULTS: APOE ε4 is associated with increased pathology while ε2 positivity is associated with reduced baseline and lower accumulation of pathologies and rates of neurodegeneration. APOE ε2ε4 is similar to ε4 (increased neurodegeneration) but with a slower rate of change. CONCLUSIONS: The strong associations observed between APOE and pathology in this study show the importance of how genetic factors influence structural brain changes. These findings suggest that ε2ε4 genotype is related to increased declines associated with the ε4 as opposed to the protective effects of the ε2. These findings have important implications for initiating treatments and interventions. Given that people who have the ε2ε4 genotype can expect to have increased atrophy, they must be included (alongside those with an ε4 profile) in targeted interventions to reduce brain changes that occur with AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→