A novel strategy facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection of proximal colonic lesions: the rubber band and sheath method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel strategy facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection of proximal colonic lesions: the rubber band and sheath method Video 1 The rubber band and sheath method for endoscopic submucosal dissection of proximal colonic lesions. Fig. 1 White-light view of the laterally spreading tumor in the ascending colon. Fig. 2 The EndoTrac T type (Top, Tokyo, Japan), which is a traction device, is composed of a plastic sheath and a line with an adjustable loop at its tip. Fig. 3 Use of the EndoTrac device (Top, Tokyo, Japan) during endoscopic submucosal dis- section.a The device was released by pulling the sheath while the endoscope was in a retroflexed position.b Pushing the sheath to the oral side was useful for exposing the submucosal layer.c Pulling the sheath to the anal side was helpful for maintaining the traction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".