Electromagnetic-Thermal Analysis of a Hybrid-Excited Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Generator for Wind Turbine Application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An accurate thermal analysis needs to be performed on the machines with new structures to ensure that their electromagnetic performance is not negatively affected. In this regard, this paper details an investigation into the electromagnetic-thermal analysis of an outer rotor hybrid-excited flux switching permanent magnet generator that gains from ferrite PMs in stator yoke and neodymium PMs in rotor segments. Incorporating ferrite PMs and barriers in the stator core enhances the power density of the proposed generator compared to the basic topology. Also, the temperature of the stator and windings of the HEFSG decreases due to the presence of barriers. As a result, the HEFSG can be a potential candidate for DDWT applications. In this study, the thermal modeling started with a 3-D FEM electromagnetic analysis to calculate the losses as heat sources. Afterward, an accurate thermal network was plotted to elucidate the thermal behaviors between various parts of the generator, where the heat sources, heat transfer coefficients, thermal resistances, and heat capacitances form the thermal characteristics of the network, which was then followed by the 3-D FEM thermal analysis. Finally, the experimental test results from the prototyped generator confirmed the accuracy of the simulation results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".