MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367155137 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2355_25

Developing predictive empirical filtration models for advanced tailings handling

2023· article· en· W4367155137 on OpenAlexaff
Jinali Nupehewa, Jason Palmer, Piia Suvio, Vesa Koponen, D Safonov

Bibliographic record

VenuePaste/˜Pœaste · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsBanff CentreGeomechanica (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersLappeenranta University of Technology
KeywordsTailingsFiltration (mathematics)Computer scienceEmpirical researchStatisticsMathematicsMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been a significant improvement in tailings dewatering techniques over recent years. However, the effects of tailings properties on the filtration process have not been vastly investigated. The different properties of tailings cause significant effects on the feasibility of filtration. Modifying or optimising filtration equipment for different tailings mixtures often requires testing procedures that involve high expenses. Therefore, an increasing demand has arisen to improve the prediction of tailings properties for efficient thickening and filtration using the available mineralogy and particle size data. Developing a suitable solution to do so is the focus of this paper. Experimental studying of tailings and their fractions helps to understand the empirical relationship of the physical properties of tailings, such as particle size distribution (PSD) and air permeability, to the filterability properties like average cake porosity and cake resistance. Also, it is vital to study how the changes of fine particle concentration affect these parameters of the tailings mixture. An algorithm developed based on the filterability of different particle size fractions of chosen minerals should be able to predict the filtration rate for a user-defined tailings blend. This type of model will be useful in evaluating the performance and economics of different tailings treatment models and studying the feasibility to produce tailings disposal solutions. It was discovered that separating fine fractions from tailings, significantly improves the filterability of the remaining portion. This opens up several further possibilities for advanced tailings handling systems. One possibility is to perform cost-efficient tailings filtration for the coarser fractions of the tailings and keep the fine fractions as slurry, which then mix with the filtration cake to form paste for surface disposal or backfill. This approach potentially allows mining companies to achieve paste rheology at lower opex and capex compared to the conventional paste thickener technology. During the study a set of laboratory experiments were conducted to fraction the tailings and determine the empirical relationships between the physical and filterability properties of each fraction and their different mixtures. Development of a filterability parameter prediction model with the PSD data and known parameters of original tailings fractions allows the possibility of predicting new, untested materials. The accuracy of the predictions depends on the degree of similarity between the new material and the original tailings material used for empirical study in this stage. By inputting the filterability parameters, suspension properties and operation conditions, the developed filtration models are able to predict the filtration process parameters such as total filtration time, final filtration volume and final cake thickness, etc. The outcome of a validated predictive filtration model can be utilised to trade-off between filtered, thickened, paste and combined treatment of tailings by modifying the tailings feed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaste/˜PœasteSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207