MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367155264 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2355_41

Loop pumping tests of crushed rock mixed with thickened tailings

2023· article· en· W4367155264 on OpenAlexaff
Thord Wennberg, Anna Stalnacke, Anders Sellgren

Bibliographic record

VenuePaste/˜Pœaste · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsBanff CentreGeomechanica (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsGeologyMining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LKAB operates three mines in northern Sweden, where the climate is subarctic with an average temperature of about 0oC. LKAB’s long-term overall objective includes feasibility considerations of thickened or filtered tailings combined with waste rock co-disposal covering cyclic economy considerations and landscape forming. At the Kiruna underground mine, about 3.5 Mtonnes of tailings and 12 Mtonnes of waste rock are generated annually. Crushing to less than 30 mm is part of the sorting plant processing, and the rock is deposited in stockpiles while the tailings are pumped conventionally to water-holding impoundments. The aim is to indicatively test the pipeline pumping of paste-rock mixtures at solids concentrations by weight of over 85% to limit segregation and leakage during deposition in nearby old pit holes. A test was carried out at a paste thickener with direct access to fresh paste, which was mixed in a concrete mixer with crushed rock from the processing. A 38 m long loop with a pipeline inner diameter of 0.075 m was equipped with a concrete type of pump. Unfortunately, a second test in a larger pipe could not be carried out at the planned time. LKAB then had the opportunity to test a laboratory-scale concrete industry device, the sliding pipe rheometer, Sliper, developed to simulate concrete pipeline pumping frictional resistance in a 0.126 m diameter pipeline. Initial loop results with crushed rock particles of up to 10 mm with a rock-to-paste mass ratio R:P of 1.2:1 showed a pressure requirement of about 25 kPa/m at 0.7 m/s for a total solids content of 84% by weight corresponding to 65% by volume and a water content of 19% (Solids density 3000 kg/m3). The 10 mm product loop pressure results agreed relatively well with simulated Sliper data scaled to 0.075m from 0.126 m for Cw 85-86% and R:P of up to 2.6:1 at 0.7 m/s. The 30mm Sliper result at 89% indicated a pressure requirement of 14 to 24 kPa/m at 0.7 m/s for R:P of 2.6:1 and 3.5:1, respectively. With a 0.15 m diameter pipeline, a pumping requirement of 20 kPa/m at 84% and 0.7 m/s was also discussed regarding feeding requirements. The results form the basis for a planned larger-diameter test. Long-term flexibility factors related to tailings availability and clarification of suitable routings and allowed water contents may necessitate that the wider diameter loop test includes a limited once-through pipeline pumping demonstration feeding arrangements. Variations in the rock-to-tailings ratio related to tailings availability and disturbances can be investigated. The system feasibility for filling depressions may cover a concentration span starting from about 75% by weight which means a more stratified flow where the coarsest particles form a sliding bed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaste/˜PœasteSame topicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207