Computational Calculation on the Shell and Tube-Type Heat Exchanger for Lanthanum Oxide (La2O3) Nanoparticle Production Process for Energy-Related Material Application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduced a design of a heat exchanger to get an optimum heat transfer enhancement technique that can be used for the production of lanthanum oxide (La2O3).The shell and tube type was selected since this type is one of the effective types for making excellent heat transfer, which was then compared to the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association (TEMA) standard to obtain the dimensional specifications of the heat exchanger device.Several parameters were calculated to evaluate the performance of the designed heat exchanger.Numerical calculation obtained from the heat exchanger containing 138 tubes can be used to maintain the temperature in the reactor (prospective temperature can change from 40 to 60℃ with rapid heating) using heating liquid (controlling by transferring heat from 100 to 70℃) with the effective value of 96%.This study can be used as a reference for supporting information in the current issue of the need for the large production of La2O3 particles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".