Linearly polarized fiber amplifier with narrow linewidth of 5 kW exhibiting a record output power and near-diffraction-limited beam quality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a narrow-linewidth polarization-maintaining (PM) all-fiber amplifier with near-diffraction-limited beam quality and record output power is presented. First, a 4.45-kW PM fiber amplifier with a 3-dB linewidth of 0.08 nm and root mean square (rms) linewidth of 0.22 nm is achieved based on optimized phase modulation. However, the sideband of the spectrum broadens significantly during the amplification process, which is mainly caused by the additional intensity variation of the injected signal. Meanwhile, an up to 5.04-kW linearly polarized fiber laser with a relatively stable spectral bandwidth is achieved by effectively suppressing spectral broadening. At the maximum output power, the rms linewidth is 0.2 nm, the beam quality factor M 2 is less than 1.3, the polarization extinction ratio (PER) is 16.5 dB, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is approximately 53 dB. The further power scaling of the amplifier is mainly limited by the pump power. To the best of our knowledge, this is the maximum output power of a narrow linewidth linearly polarized fiber amplifier to date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".