MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367173791 · doi:10.1177/1098612x231168001

Suppression of inner ear signal intensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging in cats with vestibular disease

2023· article· en· W4367173791 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Everest, Gabrielle Monteith, Luís Gaitero, Francesca Samarani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Feline Medicine and Surgery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVeterinary Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryCerebrospinal fluidMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingEndolymphVestibular systemInner earPathologyPerilymphMeniere's diseaseEndolymphatic hydropsNuclear medicineRadiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Otitis media/interna (OMI) is the most common cause of peripheral vestibular disease in cats. The inner ear contains endolymph and perilymph, with perilymph being very similar in composition to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). As a very-low-protein fluid, it would be expected that normal perilymph should suppress on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI sequences. Based on this, we hypothesized that MRI FLAIR sequences should provide a non-invasive way of diagnosing inflammatory/infectious diseases such as OMI in cats, something that has previously been demonstrated in humans and, more recently, in dogs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in which 41 cats met the inclusion criteria. They were placed into one of four groups, based on presenting complaint: clinical OMI (group A); inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease (group B); non-inflammatory structural disease (group C); and normal brain MRI (control group; group D). Transverse T2-weighted and FLAIR MRI sequences at the level of the inner ears bilaterally were compared in each group. The inner ear was selected as a region of interest using Horos, with a FLAIR suppression ratio calculated to account for variability in signal intensity between MRIs. This FLAIR suppression ratio was then compared between groups. Statistical analyses were performed by an experienced statistician, with a general linear model used to compare mean FLAIR suppression ratio, CSF nucleated cell count and CSF protein concentration between groups. RESULTS: The OMI group (group A) had significantly lower FLAIR suppression scores compared with all other groups. The CSF cell count was also significantly increased in the OMI (group A) and inflammatory CNS disease (group B) groups compared with the control group (group D). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates the utility of MRI FLAIR sequences in diagnosing presumptive OMI in cats, similarly to in humans and dogs. This study is relevant to practicing veterinary neurologists and radiologists in interpreting MRI findings in cats with suspected OMI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Feline Medicine and SurgerySame topicVeterinary Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207