MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367291408 · doi:10.46880/mtk.v8i2.1168

RANCANGAN SISTEM NOTIFIKASI KEDATANGAN PEMBELI DENGAN SUARA MENGGUNAKAN ARDUINO

2022· article· en· W4367291408 on OpenAlexaff
Al Haby Pratama Subakti, Akim Manaor Hara Pardede, Mili Alfhi Syari

Bibliographic record

VenueMETHODIKA Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT-based Control Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuzzerArduinoObject (grammar)Computer scienceComputer hardwareLiquid-crystal displayComputer graphics (images)Embedded systemArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A grocery store is a place to sell various household needs. Which provides necessities such as kitchen needs, bathing needs, school equipment, snacks, and others. A place that provides so many things is certainly not spared from theft by several members of the community. In previous research, is a system for home security. This research focuses on the installation of multisensors at each entrance in the house, which uses buzzer sensors and SMS as outputs. Therefore, to adjust the conditions at the grocery store. The components consist of Arduino UNO R3, ultrasonic sensor, DF Player, LCD, I2C, Speaker, and ESP32-CAM. This system is equipped with the feature of taking photos sent to telegram using the ESP32-CAM. The results of this study are the distance that the sensor can detect is quite far, but as a form of experiment, the author limits the distance to 12cm and will detect objects when they are at a distance of 5cm. The test proves that when the sensor detects an object with the object status coming, the speaker sounds which is connected to the DF Player by playing audio stored on the sdcard. The LCD will display the status of "there" when there is an object in the store. At that time the ESP32-CAM will take a picture and send it to a telegram. When the object passes through the object there is no response from any other component other than the LCD, which displays a “none” status which means that no object is in the store.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMETHODIKA Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem InformasiSame topicIoT-based Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207