FUME-TCRseq: Sensitive and accurate sequencing of the T-cell receptor from limited input of degraded RNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Genomic analysis of the T-cell receptor (TCR) reveals the strength, breadth and clonal dynamics of the adaptive immune response to pathogens or cancer. The diversity of the TCR repertoire, however, means that sequencing is technically challenging, particularly for samples with low quality, degraded nucleic acids. Here, we have developed and validated FUME-TCRseq, a robust and sensitive RNA-based TCR sequencing methodology that is suitable for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples and low amounts of input material. FUME-TCRseq incorporates unique molecular identifiers into each molecule of cDNA, allowing correction for sequencing errors and PCR bias. We used RNA extracted from colorectal and head and neck cancers to benchmark the accuracy and sensitivity of FUME-TCRseq against existing methods, and found excellent concordance between the datasets. Furthermore, FUME-TCRseq detected more clonotypes than a commercial RNA-based alternative, with shorter library preparation time and significantly lower cost. The high sensitivity and the ability to sequence RNA of poor quality and limited amount enables quantitative analysis of small numbers of cells from archival tissue sections, which is not possible with other methods. To demonstrate this we performed spatially-resolved FUME-TCRseq of colorectal cancers using macrodissected archival samples, revealing the shifting T-cell landscapes at the transition to an invasive phenotype, and between tumour subclones containing distinct driver alterations. In summary, FUME-TCRseq represents an accurate, sensitive and low-cost tool for the characterisation of T-cell repertoires, particularly in samples with low quality RNA that have not been accessible using existing methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".